China Demand for Tiger Parts Fuelling Poaching

Conservationists must try to reduce the demand for tiger parts in China as part of a campaign to save the big cats, wildlife experts warned at an anti-poaching conference

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Gopal Sharma

KATHMANDU (Reuters) - Conservationists must try to reduce the demand for tiger parts in China as part of a campaign to save the big cats, wildlife experts warned at an anti-poaching conference in Kathmandu.

Thousands of tigers once roamed forests in South and Southeast Asia but numbers have plummeted to about 3,000 worldwide. Experts say poaching is fueled by a thriving trade in China, where tiger parts are prized as status symbols and often used in traditional medicine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"There is a culture among more and more wealthy people in China (to own tiger parts)," said Michael Baltzer, leader of the WWF Tigers Alive Initiative, referring to people who mount tiger heads and decorate living rooms with rugs made from their pelts.

"Tiger farming in China encourages (poaching) by stimulating demand for tiger parts," said Debbie Banks, head of the Tiger Campaign at the British-based Environmental Investigation Agency.

One hundred tigers a year have been killed for the illegal trade since the turn of the century, said James Compton, Asia's program director for TRAFFIC, a wildlife trade monitoring network.

The numbers are based on tiger parts seized and reported by authorities, and suggests actual killings could be much higher.

Tigers would be hunted as long as there is such demand, said Anil Manandhar of conservation group WWF Nepal.

"Our goal should not only be zero poaching, but also for zero demand of wildlife parts," Manandhar told the conference.

Nepal is hosting the anti-poaching conference attended by delegates from 13 countries and several conservation groups to come up with a strategy to fight poaching in Asia.

India and Nepal are among countries praised at the meeting for their efforts to raise tiger numbers and curb poaching.

India's tiger population increased by nearly a third to 2,226 in four years, a survey showed last month.

Nepal reported 198 tigers in 2013, with the population of the elusive cats increasing by 64 percent in half a decade.

The country has marked two years since the last reported case of a tiger killed by poachers in 2012, said Tulsi Sharma of Nepal's Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation.

"This has been possible due to involvement of local communities in conservation efforts," said Sharma, adding that volunteers work as informers or guards to patrol national parks.

"Fifty percent revenue generated at national parks goes to local communities to get them involved in anti-poaching drive."

 

(Editing by Tony Tharakan and Robert Birsel)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe