Climate Summit Opening Remarks Reflect Urgency

Speakers including U.N. Secretary General, Vice President Al Gore, and IPCC head R.K. Pachauri spoke of the economic impact of climate change and the need for political action

Desperate warnings from world leaders and celebrities about the consequences of unmitigated climate change filled the General Assembly Hall at U.N. Headquarters in New York on Tuesday morning, as a daylong climate summit began.

"Climate change is the defining issue of our age,” U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in his opening remarks. “Our response will define the future. To ride this storm, we need all hands on deck. That’s why we are here today. We need a clear vision.”

Ki-moon scheduled the summit during annual General Assembly meetings, giving world leaders a forum in which they could share their plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The summit is being held two days after Ki-moon and hundreds of thousands rallied in the streets of New York and other locations around the globe, joining a People’s Climate March organized to bring attention to global warming.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“By end of this century, we must be carbon neutral,” Ki-moon said. “We must not emit more carbon than our planet can absorb.”

Other speakers on Tuesday morning included former Vice President Al Gore, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, and actor Leonardo DiCaprio.

Gore noted that energy from solar is cheaper than coal in 79 countries while de Blasio touted New York's reduction of annual greenhouse gas emissions by 19 percent since 2005.

“Acting on climate is not a choice between the economy and environment,” Gore said. “All we need is political will, but political will is a renewable resource.”

R.K. Pachauri, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), laid out some of the science behind climate change. "We have abundant evidence we’re changing our climate," he said.

Pachauri echoed Gore’s comments that it’s not an either/or proposition when weighing climate concerns and the economy.

“We’re told limiting climate change will be expensive. It will not. Wait until you get the bill from inaction,” he said.

Pachauri and Gore’s comments reflect recent findings published in a report last week by a group of international economists that showed reducing greenhouse gas emissions would be cheaper than inaction.

Beyond the economic arguments, a number of speakers highlighted the massive demonstration in New York as a sign that popular opinion is shifting toward solving climate change.

"The people made their voices heard," DiCaprio said. “This isn’t just about telling people to change lightbulbs or drive an electric car. This is about asking governments and industries to take large scale action.”

DiCaprio was recently appointed a U.N. Messenger of Peace and has been outspoken on climate issues.

Following the opening remarks, heads of states and other national leaders split into groups to share their “national action and ambition announcements.” Developing and poor countries were nearly united in calling on developed countries to do more to reduce their climate-changing pollution emissions and to help them adapt to the changing climate.

Bolivia president Evo Morales, for example, expressed his “concern” about a “lack of commitment by developed countries” to take larger strides toward reducing their carbon footprints.

Notably, many of the nations who spoke early on Tuesday also called on the biggest greenhouse gas-emitters to tackle global warming. Of the world’s three biggest overall climate polluters, two are fast-developing countries — India and China.

And some of the early addresses by the leaders of small and developing countries included pledges to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions rates. Brazil said it would continue working to reduce deforestation. Costa Rica reiterated its commitment to become “carbon-neutral” by 2021. Fossil fuel-rich Brunei, meanwhile, outlined a less ambitious target — an electricity supply that includes 10 percent renewables by 2035.

“The costs involved in tackling climate change are high, but the benefits are worth the efforts,” Brazil President Dilma Rousseff said. “We must reverse the logic that fighting climate change is harmful to the economy.”

Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli and President Obama were scheduled to speak at about noon.

You May Also Like: NASA Ranks This August as Warmest on Record  The $90 Trillion Climate-Stabilizing Cookbook People’s Climate March Makes Front-Page News Arctic Sea Ice to Reach Sixth Lowest Extent on Record

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on September 23, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe