New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Comet-Landing Spacecraft's Exact Location Still Eludes Scientists

The search for Philae intensifies as researchers try to determine if it can recharge its batteries, wherever it is on comet 67P

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

More than a month after the Philae spacecraft bounced to the surface of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, European Space Agency scientists still have not been able to figure out where it came to rest.

The probe landed off-kilter on November 12. Knowing where Philae now lies is crucial to understand whether enough sunlight will reach its solar panels to recharge and awaken the dormant lander. The angle of sunlight will change in the coming months as the comet approaches the Sun.

Jean-Pierre Bibring, a planetary scientist at the Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale in Orsay, France, and chief scientist for the lander, is confident that Philae will awaken early next year, perhaps sometime between February and April. But he conceded that estimate relied on exactly where the lander is. “The only question is the site,” he said on December 17 at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A series of high-resolution images being downloaded this week from the orbiting Rosetta spacecraft may finally be able to pinpoint Philae’s location. “I find it a bit strange that four weeks after landing, we don’t have it,” says Holger Sierks, a planetary scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Göttingen, Germany, and chief scientist for the camera on Rosetta that is searching for Philae.

That camera, called OSIRIS, looked for Philae on November 24 and again on December 6. It combed an area measuring 350 metres by 50 metres on the lip of a crater rim where Philae is thought to have come to a stop. The December 6 scan turned up an intriguing glint outside the search area that could have been a reflection from the spacecraft, Sierks says. But the entire region was in shadow at the time, so it is difficult to say what the camera was actually seeing.

OSIRIS tried again on December 12, 13, and 14, looking at a larger area that includes both the original scan site and the intriguing glint. The data are being downloaded now and could be available in as early as a day or two.

Because sunlight illuminated the area during the most recent search, the team is hopeful that it will see something. “It’s a bit like waiting for Christmas presents,” says Matt Taylor, Rosetta project scientist at the European Space Agency.

Philae needs on the order of 15 watts of power to awaken and be able to perform science. Its location on the comet, and the angle at which its solar panels are oriented to the Sun, will determine how long it might take to gather that power. Bibring says that the lander is currently receiving only about four and a half hours of sunlight a day.

Philae’s survival also depends on whether it can withstand the frigid temperatures on Comet 67P. Its instruments are rated to 65 degrees Celsius below zero and can probably survive conditions a bit colder than that, says Bibring. “We are confident we are in an environment to survive until the energy on the solar panels is back to what we need.”

In February, Rosetta will descend to within 10 kilometres of the surface and perform its closest comet fly-by ever.  After that, the Sun’s heat will cause so much gas and dust to fly off the comet that it will be too dangerous for Rosetta to approach. The mission's goal is to study how the comet's activity changes as it gets closer to the Sun.

Comet 67P will swing past the Sun in August 2015. The Rosetta mission had been scheduled to end in December 2015, but ESA is considering extending it for several months beyond that, Taylor says.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on December 17, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe