New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Common Sponge Soaks Up BPA, A Polluting Chemical

Scientists, cleaning their lab, discover a cheap sponge removes the substance better than many other materials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have discovered that a cheap and common sponge they use to clean surfaces and equipment in their lab has a very high capacity to absorb bisphenol A (BPA).

‘It was an accidental discovery,’ says Wei Qiu, from the University of Massachusetts, US, one of the researchers involved. ‘There was a big tank of waste BPA solution and while we were testing some other absorbent materials we accidentally dropped a sponge into the solution. We were curious and when we tested the waste solution we found a significant drop in BPA concentration and the only thing that could account for that drop was the sponge.’

BPA is a building block for polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins and, despite currently being phased out of industrial processes, has become a significant pollutant in industrial wastewaters. Environmental and health concerns associated with BPA have drawn researchers to find methods to reduce its presence.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The polyurethane sponge has fibrils that swell when they absorb liquid. Carbonyl and polyol groups on the fibrils hydrogen bond with guest BPA molecules diffused into the foam.

Lead scientist Jie Han explains how they recycle the foam: ‘We use an alkaline solution to deionise the hydrogen bonded BPA, which can then be washed off the material and recovered by neutralising the resultant alkaline solution. Compared with other sorbents like activated carbon or polymer resins this process is really easy.’ The sponge could be used up to 25 times with no sign of deterioration.

It is possible to make the foam in a variety of sizes, geometries and densities making it suitable for various sorption processes. ‘One particularly good thing about this material is its abundance and low cost,’ says Qiu, ‘combining its high flow rate and high sorption rate produces a very high treatment capacity, which is exciting for real application.’

Environmental materials scientist Saravanan Pichiah from the University of Malaya, Malaysia, comments that this kind of work ‘is an awakening idea for the implication of such commercial grade polymeric materials for environmental cleanup.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 13, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe