New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cutthroat Trout Cross-Breeds to Survive

Is this the end of Montana's famed cutthroat trout in the face of invasive rainbow trout, stream temperature rise and flow changes?

Any Montana angler worth a double-haul cast knows that the iconic state fish, the westslope cutthroat trout, has been crowded out by the non-native rainbow trout, first introduced to these rivers by well-meaning sportsmen in the 1880s.

Now those invaders are taking over the cutthroat's gene pool, too.

A new study tracks just how rapidly cross-breeding between the two species has accelerated in the past 30 years. It's invasive hybridization driven by climate change, and it could spell extinction for the ruby-throated native fish of the Big Sky state.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study has importance far beyond Montana: It provides what the researchers believe is the first empirical evidence of how global warming is promoting invasive hybridization.

"Climate change is going to affect biodiversity worldwide in a number of ways, and now it's clear that invasive hybridization is one of them," said Clint Muhlfeld, aquatic ecologist for the U.S. Geological Survey and lead author of the study published Sunday in Nature Climate Change.

The team focused its research on the Flathead River, a relatively pristine watershed in the state's northwest reaches. More than 20 million rainbow trout were stocked in the Flathead from 1889 to 1969, when the state largely stopped stocking non-native fish in its streams. But hybridization did not emerge as a widespread threat. Genetic testing in the 1970s and 1980s showed that hybridization was limited to just one downstream population in the river system.

New sampling shows hybridization has since spread rapidly upstream, to the point where half of previously pure populations are now hybridized. Known populations of genetically pure cutthroat now occupy less than 10 percent of their historical range. Stream temperature and precipitation analysis shows climate change has driven the cross-breeding.

Since the rainbow typically spawns when snowmelt is just beginning, and the westslope cutthroat spawns when snowmelt is ending, periods of reduced  snowmelt may have compressed their natural timetables so the two species are spawning at the same time.

The decades of stocking Montana's rivers with rainbow trout – the world's most widely introduced invasive fish species – amounted to "essentially a time bomb, waiting to go off in the right set of environmental conditions," Muhlfeld said.

The study underscores the uncertain future for a fish first described in the journals of the explorers Lewis and Clark, a historical significance memorialized in the species' scientific name, Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi.

The findings are particularly alarming because the Flathead River had been considered a stronghold for genetically pure populations of westslope cutthroats, sought out by anglers who venture into these wild reaches.

In Montana rivers east of the Continental Divide, the native species has all but disappeared. In the famous trout streams here, long-time Bozeman, Mont. fishing guide Dave Kumlein said most anglers are simply focused on the abundant rainbow and brown trout.

Both non-native fish have now developed as wild, self-sustaining populations. The westslope cutthroat are relegated to the upper reaches of tributaries, not the main stems most popular for fishing. In rivers like the Madison, "I don't think that the average angler would notice" the loss, Kumlein said.

Any effort to remove the non-native rainbow and brown trout in these areas would be "nearly impossible – Herculean, expensive, and unpopular," Kumlein said. "The horse is out of the barn."

But Kumlein says he recognizes the importance of Montana's efforts in recent years to restore populations of pure westslope cutthroats, especially in areas where natural barriers like falls can keep invaders out. "Whenever possible, if we can provide refuge for these native species to help them recover or restore them, I'm all for it," he said.

Intervention efforts will be important for the future of Montana fishing, noted Muhlfeld, who worked with scientists from the state Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks and the University of Montana on the climate change research. The fitness of the species – and its resilience to environmental changes – declines with hybridization, he said.

It's the same issue faced by species around the world: Climate change is going to exacerbate stressors like habitat loss and invasive species, said Muhlfeld.

"The cutthroat's genes and these gene complexes are linked to local adaptations that have allowed these fish and organisms to survive and persist for thousands of years," Muhlfeld said . "Hybridization breaks down, or jumbles up, these gene complexes linked to when the fish spawn, how they move. So over time, if we allow it to proceed, it decreases the ability of that species to be resilient and adapt in a warming climate."

This article originally appeared at The Daily Climate, the climate change news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe