New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cynicism May Cost You

Having a distrustful attitude might limit your earning power

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most of the world's population now lives in cities, which means fewer of us know our neighbors. Should we adapt to modern society by raising our guards and looking over our shoulder? Research says no—we are actually not trusting enough, and it could be costing us money.

A growing body of work has established that in laboratory studies, subjects who are less trusting of their peers make less money in investment and economic scenarios. For instance, participants in one 2009 study underestimated how many partners would return their money in an economics game, so they underinvested and wound up with lower earnings than they could have. A paper, published online in May in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, now finds some real-world evidence of the financial harm of cynicism.

Analyzing data from national surveys in the U.S. and Germany, psychologists Olga Stavrova and Daniel Ehlebracht of the University of Cologne found that people who reported cynical views of human nature had smaller incomes (by thousands of dollars) two and nine years later, compared with their more optimistic peers. The researchers ruled out several proposed explanations for the link between cynicism and income, including personality, health, education, age, gender and employment status.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Instead they propose that cynicism increases suspicion, which prevents cooperation. If that is true, cynicism should not be harmful in places where a high degree of suspicion is justified. Looking at 41 European countries, the researchers found that in nations with the highest murder rates and least volunteerism, cynicism did not correlate with lower income.

Giving others the benefit of the doubt, then, may not invite deception; it instead seems to pay off—literally, Stavrova says: “So in most places in the U.S. and western Europe, being less cynical might be a better way to go.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe