SOURCE: “INCREASING HOMOGENEITY IN GLOBAL FOOD SUPPLIES AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FOOD SECURITY,” BY COLIN K. KHOURY ET AL., IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES USA, VOL. 111, NO. 11; MARCH 18, 2014
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Back in 1961, residents of far-flung countries ate very different mixes of crops (blue, below). By 1985 the disparities worldwide had shrunk (orange), and daily fare became even more homogeneous by 2009 (magenta). In nearly 50 years the differences in foods eaten narrowed by 68 percent. Prevalent staples such as wheat have become even more dominant, and oil crops such as soybean, palm and sunflower have risen sharply (bottomright). The convergence comes at the expense of many minor crops, says Colin Khoury of the International Center for Tropical Agriculture. People are consuming more processed foods made from a small number of ingredients and are frying with oils instead of steaming. Although the resultant increase in calories has been needed in certain regions, scientists say obesity, diabetes and heart disease are rising globally. They are also concerned that if one crop falters because of disease or drought, food prices could soar and supplies across continents could crumble.
SOURCE: “INCREASING HOMOGENEITY IN GLOBAL FOOD SUPPLIES AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FOOD SECURITY,” BY COLIN K. KHOURY ET AL., IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES USA, VOL. 111, NO. 11; MARCH 18, 2014. Graphic by Jen Christiansen
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
