New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

When Art and Science Meet, Nanoscale Smiley Faces Abound [Slideshow]

Caltech researcher Paul Rothemund folds DNA strands into an origami of nanosize shapes and patterns

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

View slideshow

Paul Rothemund is a computer scientist and an artist, although not necessarily in that order. Using a few DNA molecules, an atomic force microscope and a computer, he can fit the likenesses of 50 billion smiley faces into a space no bigger than a drop of water.

Rothemund refers to his brew of art, biology and technology as "DNA origami," because it is created by using hundreds of short DNA strands (which Rothemund refers to as "staples") to fold much longer genetic ribbons into nanoscale shapes and patterns.

The resulting microscopic creations are currently on display through May 12 at MoMA–The Museum of Modern Art in New York City as part of the "Design and the Elastic Mind" exhibit. The show includes images of snowflakes and maps—not to mention 1970s-inspired smiley faces, which are only about 100 nanometers across (one one-thousandth the width of a human hair), two nanometers thick and comprise about 14,000 DNA bases.

Call it the art of science or, if you prefer, the science of art. "There is an art and an aesthetics in picking what question to ask, what tools to use to answer those questions, and especially in how one later visualizes and explains the answers," says the artist–scientist, a computer science senior research associate* at The California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "You design the stuff in a computer, you order the DNA strands, you mix them up [in saltwater]." The strands must then be heated to almost boiling and then cooled, which takes a couple hours. "It is just that simple," Rothemund adds.*

But perhaps most important, Rothemund says, is that DNA origami proves that microscopic material can be controlled so that it forms specific objects. "The reason the work is exciting for [potentially] making smaller circuits," he says, "is that this resolution is roughly eight to 10 times smaller than the features in current computer chips' [at] 45 to 60 nanometers." The process of creating DNA origami allows many shapes or patterns to be crafted simultaneously (50 billion in a single drop of water), paving the way to make loads of circuits more quickly and cheaper than is now possible.

Rothemund envisions many other possible applications as well. "It's going to be a kind of nanoscale test bed," he says, "so you can arrange things how you want, to see how they work."

Rothemund is currently working with IBM to apply the technique to circuits, but he concedes that an application for a consumer use is years away. "Fifty years from now," he says, "or maybe sooner, we want to be able to program molecules the same way we program computers."

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


* Note: Paul Rothemund was originally identified as senior research fellow. His most recent title and the additional steps involved in preparing the DNA strands were added after the article's original posting on April 11, 2008.

View slideshow

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe