New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Dope on Dopamine's Central Role in the Brain's Motivation and Reward Networks

Researchers use two imaging methods to pinpoint dopamine as key chemical in human brain's pleasure and motivation circuits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have for the first time found that the neurotransmitter dopamine is central to the human brain network governing motivation and a sense of reward and pleasure—and that it changes with age. The finding could provide clues to healthy, happy aging and pave the way to new treatments for neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia as well as addictive behaviors from alcoholism and drug abuse to compulsive gambling.

The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) team used two imaging methods, positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to examine the normal human brain reward circuit, a complex neurochemical network that centers around a path from the ventral tegmental area in the midbrain (where dopamine is synthesized) to the nucleus accumbens in the forebrain (where it is released). Comparing brain activity in volunteers playing video slot machines, the researchers identified processes involved both in anticipating a reward and actually getting one—and discerned age-dependent changes in those processes.

Wolfram Schultz, a neuroscientist at the University of Cambridge in England, says the researchers "have tried to push the frontier" by combining two imaging techniques: fMRI, which measures time course, and the PET study, which measures dopamine synthesis rate. "This is a very smart combination," he says.

The study, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, compared brain activity in 20 younger subjects (mean age 25) with that in 13 older ones (mean age 66), all in good health. "This is building a foundation upon which we can search for interventions when aging is not so successful or when this reward system is abnormal," says senior study author Karen Berman, chief of the integrative neuroimaging at NIMH's Clinical Brain Disorders Branch. Bruce Jenkins, director of neurochemical imaging at the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, praised the study, although he noted the small number of subjects. The next step, he said, should be to investigate the mechanism underlying the age-related changes.

On tap: similar studies of people whose aging has not been successful or who suffer from dopamine-related states such as Parkinson's, depression and addictions. Berman says she and her NIMH colleagues have already launched such a study of schizophrenia, a disorder characterized both by hallucinations and loss of motivation. The malady has long been known to involve dopamine circuits.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe