Electron Spin Plays New Semiconductor Tricks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the simplest devices imaginable--a strip of electrified semiconductor--continues to befuddle physicists. The flow of charge is easy enough to understand. The mystery lies in the behavior of spin, or the angular momentum associated with an electron. Researchers studying currents in a room-temperature semiconductor wire have now observed a pair of odd spin effects thought extremely unlikely to occur in that material or at such a high temperature.

An electron's spin can point in any direction but is often most useful when polarized in particular directions, such as up or down. Polarizing spin usually requires a magnetic field, but researchers imagine adding a whole new dimension to electronics by learning how to control spin using electric fields instead. Microchips might then convert rapidly varying spins into shifting polarized light for faster communications inside the chip or secure cryptography over a network. Toward that goal, researchers have demonstrated that electrons coursing through a semiconductor made of gallium arsenide are spontaneously polarized in the plane of the wire, if chilled below 50 kelvins (-223 degrees Celsius). Several materials also cause flowing electrons to rapidly segregate themselves such that spin-up electrons creep along one side of the wire and spin-down electrons take the other, in what is called the spin Hall effect. Researchers thought both these behaviors depended on strong electric fields in the materials and would be drowned out at warmer temperatures.

Planning to perform a control experiment in a semiconductor with a naturally weak electric field, experimental physicist David Awschalom of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and his co-workers sent current through a zinc selenide strip and turned on a special scanning microscope capable of imaging and distinguishing spin states in real time. Unexpectedly, they witnessed both spin polarization and the spin Hall effect all the way from five to 295 kelvins (22 degrees Celsius), they report in the September 22 Physical Review Letters. "Why it occurs is a very big mystery," Awschalom says. "It means there's some other piece of physics underlying this."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Solid-state theorist Bertrand Halperin of Harvard University says it's still not clear whether existing explanations are wrong or the experiment is so sensitive it is detecting a subtle consequence of them. "These semiconductor systems look much simpler than high-temperature superconductors or other exotic materials, and yet we find that we don't understand them very well," he observes. That may be a hindrance in realizing applications, but for basic physics it's a field day.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe