New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Element 118 Dropped from Periodic Table

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL) have formally retracted their claims for the discovery of the most massive chemical element. The synthesis of the "superheavy" element 118, comprising 118 protons and 175 neutrons, was announced in a 1999 paper in Physical Review Letters. The results appeared to confirm theories from the 1970s that predicted heightened stability for nuclei containing around 114 protons and 184 neutrons.

The retraction, published in the current Physical Review Letters, follows failures to reproduce the reported results by the Berkeley researchers and also by scientists in Germany and Japan. After re-analysis of the original data using different software codes, the team was forced to admit that their evidence for element 118 was spurious, prompting all but one of the original paper¿s authors to endorse the retraction.

The initial results had been seen as an early success for the newly constructed Berkeley Gas-filled Separator (BGS). The team bombarded a lead-208 target with neutron-rich krypton-86 ions, in an 88-inch Cyclotron, creating heavy compound nuclei. They then used strong magnetic fields in the BGS to separate the putative element 118 ions. The Berkeley lab is not currently answering questions about how the misidentification process occurred, but some media outlets have reported falsification of the results by one team member.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The original announcement came soon after the successful production of element 114 by scientists at Russia¿s Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna , in January 1999. LBL researchers believed that their newly formed element 118, dubbed "ununoctium" (meaning one-one-eight), radioactively decayed within milliseconds, to create the element 116--also never previously synthesized. Since then, the Russian scientists have used a different method to reproduce element 116, but at least for now, element 118 must remain crossed off the Periodic Table.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe