New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Extended Forecast: Northern Hemisphere Could Be in for Extreme Winters

Winter weather is more likely to be seriously cold or strangely warm, and less likely than ever to be "normal"

Meteorological summer has begun in the Northern Hemisphere, but what is happening right now in the arctic could dramatically affect the weather you confront come December.

This past winter was the warmest in U.S. history whereas eastern Europe was stuck in a deadly deep freeze with snow piled up to the rooftops. The winter before, however, it was the U.S. that got clobbered. What's going on? What will happen this year?

We may finally have some answers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new analysis published today in Oceanography by atmospheric scientists Charles Greene and Bruce Monger at Cornell University traces the severity of winter to the extent of summer melting of arctic sea ice. An increase in melting is causing fundamental changes in the jet stream—the primary pressure gradient in the atmosphere that most affects winter weather in the middle latitudes across the Northern Hemisphere. Their conclusion: winter weirdness may become the norm.

Sea ice reflects sunlight. But as more of it melts, more ocean water is exposed. The water, much darker than ice, absorbs more of the sun’s heat and warms, which in turn melts even more of the ice, setting up a feedback loop. In the autumn the ocean releases the excess heat into the atmosphere. That decreases the difference (or gradient) in temperature between the arctic and middle latitudes, which in turn lessens the difference between the air-pressure fields in those regions. The pressure field from 70 degrees north latitude up to the North Pole is called the Arctic Oscillation. The pressure field from 70 degrees down to the subtropics is called the North Atlantic Oscillation.

Lessening the difference between the two oscillations, Greene says, alters how the jet stream behaves in winter—either socking us with extreme cold and snow from the arctic or allowing tropical heat to waft much farther north than usual. The new behavior, he says, can explain record European cold and the record U.S. warmth last winter, the "snowmageddon" that buried Washington, D.C., in 2010, and what is likely to happen this coming winter.

Cold European winter, 2011–12: The jet stream flows west to east across the northern latitudes of the U.S., Europe and Asia. It rarely looks like a straight horizontal line, however. As we often see on a typical TV weather forecast, one portion of the line usually bends gently southward and then bends gently northward again, looking somewhat like a sine wave as it circles Earth. Lessening the pressure gradient between the Arctic Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation, however, lets arctic air drift southward into the jet stream. But here's the clincher: When the pressure gradient is weaker, the jet stream slows. That allows the big bends to reach even farther south and farther north than usual, and tends to lock in those extreme positions for more days than usual. Those circumstances put eastern Europe into the deep freeze.

Warm U.S. winter, 2011–12: So why did the U.S. see record warmth at the same time? Remember the sine wave. Over the eastern half of the U.S., the jet stream bent far north and stayed that way for a long time, allowing warm air from the subtropics to drift up to the Canadian border and remain there. This pattern was reinforced by a La Niña pressure pattern in the Pacific Ocean, which tends to turn the jet stream northward over the eastern U.S.

Snowy U.S. winter, 2010–11: The year before, however, the weaker gradient between the Arctic Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation caused the jet stream to dip deeply across the eastern U.S. and stay there. It also so happened that an El Niño event occurred in the Pacific, which tends to push the jet stream north across the western U.S., such that it bends southward across the Northeast, pulling down cold arctic air with it.

The lesson in all this is that the more that arctic sea ice melts in summer, the more extreme the jet stream's bends will become and the longer they will stay in place, making our winters either colder or warmer than usual. "The arctic climate system is changing so dynamically that the rules of the game are changing," Greene says. "This is not the same Arctic Ocean we've known. The Arctic and North Atlantic oscillations are changing in ways we hadn't anticipated." The interplay, which has always been fairly consistent, he says, has now become "a wild card" affecting our weather.

As a result, Greene says, an "average" winter will become less likely. Brace yourselves for extremely cold or extremely warm winters. Although climate scientists cannot predict in detail how the oscillations will behave beyond two weeks into the future, if arctic sea ice continues to melt extensively each summer, Greene says, "I would be willing to say that we should anticipate more outbreaks of cold arctic air and snow hitting the eastern seaboard [of the U.S.]. You couldn't bet on a specific year being that way, but if you bet over 10 years, you would probably make money."

The odds for a cold Northeast winter beginning this December got even higher on June 7, when the National Weather Service's Climate Prediction Center put the world on an El Niño watch for the season.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe