New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Findings Strengthen Case for Signs of Early Life in Australian Rocks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Over the last several billion years, sediments on the earth have been raised and lowered, cooled and heated, twisted and straightened. Any possible fossil traces of life from such dim reaches of time have become extremely difficult to distinguish from the surrounding rock. Indeed, all of the oldest putative signatures of life are smudged and disputed. But a new analysis claims to significantly bolster the theory that some peculiar rocks from Australia contain some of the first signs of life.

Abigail Allwood of Macquarie University and her colleagues studied a 10-kilometer stretch of rock in Australia's Pilbara region identified nearly 30 years ago as the remnants of stromatolites. These distinctive, layered mounds are the result of colonies of cyanobacteria or other microorganisms that have captured and cemented sediment and sand. But some researchers have challenged that theory, noting that chemical activity around hydrothermal vents could produce similar structures.

Allwood's team undertook a comprehensive survey of the disputed stromatolites, detailing the variety of shapes contained therein, the ancient setting revealed by the rocks as well as any similarities to present day microbial mats. They found more than seven types of rocks with different features corresponding to how the rock particles were deposited. Some have a surface resembling egg-carton ripples; others take the shape of large cones.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers argue that it is unlikely that purely inanimate processes produced this wide variety of markings in one, relatively small, area. Additionally, the cone-shaped formations show signs of grains being cemented to their sides, suggesting that microbes fixed them there. Areas between these cones, on the other hand, appear to contain only sediment deposited by waves in a shallow sea.

Because this fossil layer rests between two volcanic layers, it can be precisely dated to 3.43 billion years old. Thus, if Allwood and her collaborators are correct, the stromatolites rank among the oldest signs of life on the earth. "What is so striking about their scenario is that it is so 'normal'--in the sense that transgressive, tidally influenced carbonate platforms with stromatolites are common in the geologic record. Stromatolites are also known to form in similar environments today," argues Stanley Awramik in a commentary accompanying the paper in today's Nature. "This is not the first report on stromatolites from this formation and it probably won't be the last."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe