New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fire! Neandertal Chemistry

Archaic humans used manganese dioxide to start fires, not—as thought—just for body paint

Reconstruction of the head of the Shanidar 1 fossil, a Neanderthal male who lived c. 70,000 years ago.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Chunks of black manganese oxides have been recovered at Neanderthal sites for many years, and until now it was thought to have been used as a source of body paint, as it is often found alongside other coloured minerals. However, some have pointed out that there would have been more readily available sources of black pigment, including ash and charcoal.

Now, a group led by Marie Soressi at Leiden University in the Netherlands has put forward the idea that these compounds were instead used as firelighters. When they analysed the composition of manganese oxide blocks recovered from the Pech-de-l’Azé Neanderthal site in southern France, they found that they mainly contained manganese dioxide, which is similar in colour but more flammable than other manganese oxides. They also noticed scratch marks on blocks, suggesting they may have been scraped or ground to produce a powder. They found that when ground-up samples of the blocks were sprinkled over wood it lowered the ignition temperature by more than 100°C. These findings support the view that that rather than just exploiting naturally occurring wildfires, Neanderthals were able to start their own.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on March 1, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe