Flatworms Recall Familiar Environs, Even after Losing Their Heads

Flatworms remember their surroundings, even after being decapitated and growing a new head

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The flatworms known as planarians are neuroscience darlings. Their centralized brain, complex sensory abilities and rapid regenerative capacities make these nonparasitic worms ideal for studying the mechanisms that regulate stem cell function, neuronal development and limb regrowth. To this repertoire, scientists have now added a new trick: these invertebrates can store memories outside their brain and retrieve them after losing their head and growing a new one.

Researchers at Tufts University tested the worms' recall by leveraging a quirk of planarian behavior: worms that recognize a familiar locale will settle in to feed more quickly than planarians that find themselves in a new environment. Such newcomers typically need time to explore their surroundings to ensure their safety before they eat. So the researchers introduced planarians to a textured petri dish and allowed them to get acquainted with their environs. Next they decapitated the worms and waited two weeks for their heads to grow back.

The scientists then jogged the worms' memory by briefly returning them to the dish and feeding them. The idea was to revive the dormant memory from the body through a short exposure to familiar turf. “For the worm, automatically imprinting the new brain tissue with an old memory that could end up being completely irrelevant would be a waste,” says study co-author Michael Levin, a Tufts developmental biologist. “So the brief exposure tells the brain that the memory is indeed relevant.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the researchers returned the trained flatworms to the same dish, the planarians initiated feeding much more quickly than worms that had gone through the same routine but had not explored the dish prior to decapitation.

The experiment upholds a controversial, decades-old finding by a colorful neuroscientist named James V. McConnell. In the 1950s and 1960s McConnell performed similar tests on planarians—going as far as to feed bits of trained worms to their untrained brethren in an effort to transfer molecules of memory. But some researchers questioned the objectivity of his experiments, many of which were detailed not in mainstream journals but in his own Worm Runner's Digest. The Tufts group aimed to minimize observer bias by using a machine to track and analyze the worms' behavior.

The new research, published in the Journal of Experimental Biology, could have implications for the development of artificial memory and the study of neurodegenerative diseases, which researchers hope to treat by someday replacing damaged brain tissue. “We really don't know what that could do to a patient's personality or memories,” Levin says. “Planarians are the model that might finally enable us to start looking at that.”

About Arielle Duhaime-Ross

Arielle is a Scientific American editorial intern. She covers a variety of topics including health, technology and zoology.

More by Arielle Duhaime-Ross
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Total Recall” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 4 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1013-29a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe