New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Flatworms Recall Familiar Environs, Even after Losing Their Heads

Flatworms remember their surroundings, even after being decapitated and growing a new head

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The flatworms known as planarians are neuroscience darlings. Their centralized brain, complex sensory abilities and rapid regenerative capacities make these nonparasitic worms ideal for studying the mechanisms that regulate stem cell function, neuronal development and limb regrowth. To this repertoire, scientists have now added a new trick: these invertebrates can store memories outside their brain and retrieve them after losing their head and growing a new one.

Researchers at Tufts University tested the worms' recall by leveraging a quirk of planarian behavior: worms that recognize a familiar locale will settle in to feed more quickly than planarians that find themselves in a new environment. Such newcomers typically need time to explore their surroundings to ensure their safety before they eat. So the researchers introduced planarians to a textured petri dish and allowed them to get acquainted with their environs. Next they decapitated the worms and waited two weeks for their heads to grow back.

The scientists then jogged the worms' memory by briefly returning them to the dish and feeding them. The idea was to revive the dormant memory from the body through a short exposure to familiar turf. “For the worm, automatically imprinting the new brain tissue with an old memory that could end up being completely irrelevant would be a waste,” says study co-author Michael Levin, a Tufts developmental biologist. “So the brief exposure tells the brain that the memory is indeed relevant.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the researchers returned the trained flatworms to the same dish, the planarians initiated feeding much more quickly than worms that had gone through the same routine but had not explored the dish prior to decapitation.

The experiment upholds a controversial, decades-old finding by a colorful neuroscientist named James V. McConnell. In the 1950s and 1960s McConnell performed similar tests on planarians—going as far as to feed bits of trained worms to their untrained brethren in an effort to transfer molecules of memory. But some researchers questioned the objectivity of his experiments, many of which were detailed not in mainstream journals but in his own Worm Runner's Digest. The Tufts group aimed to minimize observer bias by using a machine to track and analyze the worms' behavior.

The new research, published in the Journal of Experimental Biology, could have implications for the development of artificial memory and the study of neurodegenerative diseases, which researchers hope to treat by someday replacing damaged brain tissue. “We really don't know what that could do to a patient's personality or memories,” Levin says. “Planarians are the model that might finally enable us to start looking at that.”

About Arielle Duhaime-Ross

Arielle is a Scientific American editorial intern. She covers a variety of topics including health, technology and zoology.

More by Arielle Duhaime-Ross
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Total Recall” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 4 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1013-29a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe