Frigid Polar Vortex Unlikely to Repeat This Winter

NOAA's winter climate outlook suggests this winter will not be as unusual as last one

Those who shivered through the recent frigid and long-lasting winter can perhaps look forward to a reprieve from the onslaught of the Polar Vortex, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday in it’s newly released winter climate outlook.

“At this point there’s nothing that indicates we’ll see a repeat of that,” said Mike Halpert, acting director of NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center.

That said, it is winter, and winter is, well, cold. It’s also the type of year when incursions of Arctic air are most likely to happen, though it’s unlikely last winter’s seemingly frigid temps will repeat itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“I would never say anything is impossible, but I would certainly say unlikely,” Halpert said.

Halpert also cautioned that “those kinds of really extreme type winters . . . are pretty much impossible to forecast.” The repeated incursions of the vortex weren't anticipated last year. Though NOAA expected parts of the Northerns Plains to be unusually cold, the Northeast was expected to have a warmer-than-normal winter.

Though last winter felt extreme (and the Polar Vortex pattern was unusually persistent) in the eastern portions of the country, it was actually only the 34th coldest in the 119-year NOAA records. It only felt so cold in part because winters have been warming overall in the U.S. (as well as across the globe) as greenhouse gases accumulating in the atmosphere trap more and more heat.

The winter outlook that NOAA puts out each year can’t tell us whether there will be big blizzards in Chicago or ice storms in Atlanta. Instead, it is what forecasters call a “probabilistic outlook” — it can only tell us what is more or less likely to happen compared to the normal winter climate in regions of the country.

“It’s important to realize that the nature of a probabilistic forecast means that other outcomes are always possible, just less likely,” Halpert told reporters during a press briefing.

Thursday’s release looked not only at what broad temperature trends were likely across the country, but also at where winter precipitation was likely to be above or below normal. The big story for precipitation is in California, where a severe drought has entrenched itself over the past few years, and where winter is the prime month for precipitation that could help relieve the drought.

Forecasters are limited in how much they can say about the coming cold season because of the lack of strong climate signals from El Nino and other factors “that give us clues to what the season will bring,” Halpert said.

The El Nino that has been struggling to form for the past six months has yet to fully emerge, and when it does, it is expected to be only a weak event. The winter impacts associated with weak El Ninos are less clear-cut than those associated with strong events.

But, with the information they have, the winter outlook “does favor above-average precipitation across the entire southern tier of the nation,” from Southern California to Florida and up the Eastern Seaboard, Halpert said.

On the flip side, below-average precipitation is expected in the Great Lakes region, Hawaii and the Pacific Northwest, which could intensify the drought that has crept up from California into Oregon.

“The rest of the country . . . falls into what we call the equal-chance category,” Halpert said. In other words, it’s equally as likely that those places will see above- or below-normal precipitation.

Though Southern California could see some boosted precipitation this winter, NOAA expects the drought to persist in much of the state, as detailed in their Drought Outlook for the nation, also released Thursday. The key to moving out of the drought is a healthy snowpack in Northern California, and there is no clear signal on what winter may bring there. Even a normal precipitation year for the state won’t erase the drought, which covers all of California.

“There’s still going large parts of drought in California when the winter’s over,” Halpert said.

The drought picture isn’t all bad though, as “we do see some removal or improvement across the Central and Southern Plains,” said Kevin Werner, western regional climate services director with NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. Some less intense drought in the Northeast is also likely to be erased, he said.

In terms of temperature, the one part of the country that could see chillier-than-normal conditions is the southern tier from New Mexico through Arkansas and over to South Carolina and Florida, according to the outlook.

On the other side of the temperature coin, the western portions of the country, as well as the northern Midwest and the Northeast, could see warmer-than-normal winter temperatures.

The rest of the country has equal chances of either outcome, so you may still want to get out the sled and the long underwear.

You May Also Like: Calif. Heads for Warmest Year As Drought Hangs On Pentagon: Climate Change Poses ‘Immediate Risks’ September Was Warmest on Record, NASA Data Shows Where Is El Nino? And Why Do We Care

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on October 16, 2014.

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe