Global Initiative Seeks 1,000 New Cancer Models

The effort will use next-generation cell-culture methods and fresh patient samples

cancer cell

The initial goal of 1,000 cell lines would roughly double the world's collection of accessible cancer cell models.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An international collaboration of cancer-research heavy-weights aims to grow 1,000 new cell lines for scientists to study — and that could be just the beginning.

The Human Cancer Models Initiative announced its pilot project on July 11, and intends to complete the initial 1,000 models within 3 years. Members of the initiative include the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland; Cancer Research UK in London; the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK; and Hubrecht Organoid Technology of Utrecht in the Netherlands.

The initial goal of 1,000 cell lines would roughly double the world’s collection of accessible cancer cell models, says Louis Staudt, head of the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics. But if all goes well during the pilot, the project will generate thousands more. Staudt estimates that researchers need about 10,000 models to fully capture the diversity of relatively common genetic subtypes of cancer. “Whether we actually will push into that depends a lot upon how easy and valuable the cell lines are from the pilot,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Reflections of reality

The initiative’s models will offer several improvements over most available cell lines. Each line will be matched with clinical data about the donor patient, and how they responded to treatment. The project will also use cutting-edge techniques to generate its models, which will include 3D cultures called organoids, and cells that have been reprogrammed to grow indefinitely in culture.

The hope is that these features will better reflect human cancers, enabling the cells to be used to model disease, screen for new drugs and determine which treatments are suited for which cancers.

Umber Cheema, a tissue engineer at University College London, says that the initiative is an exciting opportunity to unite protocols and expertise from different research groups. “It’s been a little bit disjointed, in terms of different people in different countries working on their specific models,” she says. “We have so much we can share with each other.”

The pilot project will give members of the initiative a chance to work out the kinks in their protocols, searching for ways to make their pipelines cheaper and more efficient, says Mathew Garnett, a cancer researcher at the Sanger Institute. A key stumbling block can be establishing a network of clinics able to collect samples — and consent forms — and rush them to research labs to generate the models.  

At the NCI, the Human Cancer Models Initiative will be paired with another effort to create a large collection of human cancer cells that have been grown in mice. Cell lines generated from that project will be fed into the cancer-models initiative, says Staudt.

The NCI is also interested in exploring other methods of deriving cell models — a hot field in cancer research. Staudt notes that groups are working to find optimal conditions for difficult-to-grow cancer cells, such as lymphoma. Others are trying to refine current models so that they better reflect a tumour’s natural environment. Cheema’s group, for example, grows cells in 3D cultures that reproduce some aspects of a tumour's environment, and even contain a rudimentary vascular system. Her team hopes to refine the technique so that it can be used to determine whether an individual’s cancer cells is likely to be metastatic, or to respond to a given therapy.

“There are people out there with their own special sauce,” says Staudt. “We are open to all of these opportunities.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 11, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe