GM Tomato Tastes Better

Taste testers prefer tomatoes that carry a flavor-enhancing gene

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Shoppers who miss the taste of farm-grown tomatoes may find solace in a new technology that puts back what generations of breeding for hardiness and shelf life have taken out. A new variety of tomato has been genetically modified (GM) to produce geraniol, a rose-smelling compound found in fruits and flowers. In a blind taste test, 60 percent of 37 testers preferred the flavor of the GM tomato, according to a study published online this week in Nature Biotechnology.

The result proves that genetic modification can potentially restore some of the flavor and aroma lost as breeders have created more durable strains of tomatoes and other crops, says biotechnologist Efraim Lewinsohn of the Newe Ya'ar Research Center in Ramat Yishay, Israel, who led the research. "You often sit down in living rooms and people complain tomatoes don't taste like they used to," he says.

In an effort to banish such idle supper time chatter forever, Lewinsohn and colleagues gave extra-large cherry tomatoes [see image above] a geraniol-synthesizing gene from the lemon basil plant. The modified tomato does not taste exactly like a traditional tomato, but it does noticeably change and enhance the flavor—something that GM technology has not achieved before, Lewinsohn says. Tomatoes contain more than 400 volatiles, or potentially fragrant compounds, and researchers have yet to identify the most important contributors to the classic tomato taste.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team found that tomatoes broke down geraniol into at least ten other lemon- and rose-smelling compounds. Taste testers described the fruit as smelling like rose, geranium and lemongrass. One side effect of the change was a reduction in lycopene, a red carotenoid pigment, which gave the tomatoes a more orange hue.

Lewinsohn says the commercial acceptance of this or any other flavor-enhanced tomato would depend on consumer tastes and attitudes. He adds that, in principle, flavor improvement could come from more traditional breeding instead of GM technology, which is unpopular in European countries.

Another possible source of better-tasting tomatoes is the local farmers' market—or even the backyard garden—but Lewinsohn notes that locally grown tomatoes are not available year-round. "If you want commercial production of good quality tomatoes," he says, "that's more difficult."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe