"Grandparenting" in Moderation Might Help Keep the Mind Sharp

A small Australian study finds that grandmothers who take care of their grandchildren one day a week do better on cognitive tests than peers who mind grandkids more often, or not at all

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Janice Neumann

(Reuters Health) - A small Australian study finds that grandmothers who take care of their grandchildren one day a week do better on cognitive tests than peers who mind grandkids more often, or not at all.

Researchers say the brain benefits from this form of "grandparenting" may come not just from having social engagement, but "active" engagement in those relationships.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The key point here is they found that the socialization part was important primarily when it was associated with some kind of useful function," said Dr. William J. Hall, a geriatrician who was not involved in the study.

"The party line on this from geriatricians like me is that some form of social engagement seems to be absolutely essential for maximizing the chances you will have good brain function for those years," said Hall, who directs the Center for Healthy Aging at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York.

Study authors Katherine Burn and Cassandra Szoeke, researchers at the University of Melbourne in Parkville, Australia, point out online March 24 in the journal Maturitas that lifestyle and environmental factors are easy, inexpensive ways of boosting cognitive health and might even help stave off chronic illnesses like dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

For the new study, they used data from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project, which Szoeke directs, and which involves Australian women originally recruited for a midlife study in 1991, when they were aged 45 to 55.

The 224 women included in the new analysis were between 65 and 75 and lived in the Melbourne area. Most had grandkids, and most spent time taking care of an average of three grandchildren. Those who did care for grandchildren were about a year younger and more likely to have at least 12 years of formal education than those who didn't.

The researchers used various tests to gauge the women's cognitive ability.

After factoring in the women's age and education levels, the researchers found that those who were caring for grandkids one day per week did better on the cognitive tests than those who weren't minding grandkids, or those who were caring for grandkids up to five days a week.

"We wanted to be able to guide people on a common, in fact the most popular informal childcare option prevalent in our community," Szoeke said in an email. "The aspects of social engagement hypothesized to be responsible for the benefits on cognition (positive mood, mental stimulation, increased activity) were highly relevant to activity as a grandparent."

But more research is needed on the benefits of social engagement to cognition in general, and especially on the role grandparenting could play in its maintenance, the authors note.

The study did not account for health or economic factors that might affect the women's cognitive function, as well as possibly influencing whether or how often they cared for their grandchildren.

The authors acknowledge that their results suggest a connection between some amount of grandparenting and better mental function, but cannot prove cause and effect.

Hall said that he wasn't sure if the results would apply to the United States, where the pace is faster and the quality of life less "tranquil" than in Melbourne. But he said he thought the information should prove useful to older people.

"In the field of geriatrics and gerontology, this whole idea of social engagement and what kind of social engagement goes forward is extremely hot right now," said Hall. "This is better than treating people with pills.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1I0ZhGm

Maturitas 2015.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe