New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Greener Fracking Tech Reduces Injection of Lots of Wasteful Fluid

Chemical expands underground, so drillers can use less fluid that turns into wastewater

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers in the US have created a chemically-responsive fluid to efficiently fracture rocks that could decrease the amount of energy required for fracking.

Current hydraulic fracturing methods are energy-intensive due to the need to pump, on average, 4 million gallons of water per reservoir, at very high pressures and flow rates deep into the ground. This water also contains additives including biocides, corrosion inhibitors and friction reducers.

The fluid, developed by Carlos Fernandez of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and coworkers, expands by up to 2.5 times its original volume in response to carbon dioxide. It is made from poly(allylamine) and could reduce the volume of water required for fracking, as well as being non-toxic, a biocide, and a corrosion inhibitor, circumventing the addition of extra chemicals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On stimulation with carbon dioxide, Fernandez’s fluid transitions from an aqueous solution to a hydrogel, exerting pressure and stress in the rock as it swells, which initiates fractures. This reduces the requirement for external pressure, and since the transition is reversible via carbon dioxide depressurisation or addition of acid, the fluid can be removed from the rock and recycled, further limiting its environmental impact.

‘The fracturing fluid is chemically-responsive, an interesting and promising characteristic that allows control over the system’s hydraulic pressure when needed,’ says Young-Shin Jun, an environmental and chemical engineer at Washington University in the US.

Fernandez says that if this technology can be reproduced on a large scale, the time required for reservoir formation could be reduced by half, as well as reducing the costs in comparison to current systems. The components required are readily available in bulk at reasonable cost.

Joseph Moore, an environmental engineer at the University of Utah, US, describes the fluid as ‘potentially game-changing’. ‘It has the potential to avoid the environmental issues associated with oil and gas polymers,’ he adds.

One of the next steps would be to test this technology on a metre-scale rock sample, as well as to develop and test the carbon dioxide-delivery methods on a larger scale. The team will also evaluate the fluid’s recycling capability by quantifying the polymer mass recovered under different conditions. However, they estimate that their technology could significantly decrease reservoir creation costs.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 14, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe