Hair Follicles in a Dish Make for Cruelty-Free Testing

Researchers are testing treatments for baldness on lab-grown locks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cell biologist Desmond Tobin spends his days harvesting organs from cosmetic surgery patients. But Tobin is not after kidneys or other vital parts. Instead he collects swatches of skin removed from behind the ear during face-lift procedures. Crucially for Tobin, the skin samples contain the miniature organs, known as follicles, that produce hair.

At the Center for Skin Sciences at the University of Bradford in England, Tobin carefully extracts the follicles and uses them to replicate human hair growth in a petri dish.

With the harvested follicles, investigators such as James V. (“Vince”) Gruber, global director of research and development at Lonza Consumer Care, can test the effectiveness of new hair and skin products without relying on laboratory animals. Gruber explained his work at the annual meeting of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists last December.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two different molecules show promise for potential hair-loss treatments, Gruber said. A yeast peptide appears to reverse senescence—when follicle cells linger in a dormant state and cease to replicate. And an antioxidant called an isoflavone increases collagen and elastin concentrations, which strengthen the skin matrix holding the follicles in place.

Tobin and Gruber have thus far focused on hair that has been chemically forced into senescence. The next step is to determine if follicles naturally heading toward dormancy could be persuaded to return to an active state.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe