New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hair Follicles in a Dish Make for Cruelty-Free Testing

Researchers are testing treatments for baldness on lab-grown locks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cell biologist Desmond Tobin spends his days harvesting organs from cosmetic surgery patients. But Tobin is not after kidneys or other vital parts. Instead he collects swatches of skin removed from behind the ear during face-lift procedures. Crucially for Tobin, the skin samples contain the miniature organs, known as follicles, that produce hair.

At the Center for Skin Sciences at the University of Bradford in England, Tobin carefully extracts the follicles and uses them to replicate human hair growth in a petri dish.

With the harvested follicles, investigators such as James V. (“Vince”) Gruber, global director of research and development at Lonza Consumer Care, can test the effectiveness of new hair and skin products without relying on laboratory animals. Gruber explained his work at the annual meeting of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists last December.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two different molecules show promise for potential hair-loss treatments, Gruber said. A yeast peptide appears to reverse senescence—when follicle cells linger in a dormant state and cease to replicate. And an antioxidant called an isoflavone increases collagen and elastin concentrations, which strengthen the skin matrix holding the follicles in place.

Tobin and Gruber have thus far focused on hair that has been chemically forced into senescence. The next step is to determine if follicles naturally heading toward dormancy could be persuaded to return to an active state.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe