Heart Rhythms Seem Circadian in Nature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The chances of suffering heart problems are not equal throughout the day. Heart attacks occur more often around 10 o'clock in the morning than any other time, a peak that previously was attributed to daily behavior patterns getting underway. A report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that the heartbeats of healthy people, too, exhibit strong circadian rhythms, which could help explain the morning crest of adverse cardiac events.

Steven A. Shea of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues studied healthy individuals between the ages of 20 and 33 years old. The volunteers lived in individual suites for 10 days and had their regular daily patterns disrupted. They were monitored closely and asked to adhere to specific sleep and wake cycles while having their heartbeats monitored using electrocardiograms. The team discovered that a feature of the subjects' heartbeats known as the scaling exponent, which is a statistical classification of beats over time, displayed a significant 24-hour rhythm regardless of daily activities. What is more, the peak occurred between nine and 11 a.m.

According to the report, the findings suggest that "the underlying mechanism of cardiac regulation is strongly influenced by the endogenous circadian pacemaker." And because higher scaling exponents are associated with heart disease, the scientists posit that this fundamental pattern could influence vulnerable people, such as those suffering from congestive heart failure, and contribute to the pattern of early morning heart attacks observed in epidemiological studies.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe