New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Heartburn Meds Alter the Gut

Acid blockers reduce the diversity of bacteria in the intestines—and that could lead to trouble

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 2014 Americans filled more than 170 million prescriptions for acid blockers known as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to treat gastric conditions, including indigestion, peptic ulcers and acid reflux. These medications are among the top 10 prescribed in the country as a class and are also available over the counter. Surveys suggest that they are widely overused, and in such cases, the drugs may do more harm than good. In fact, two new studies found that PPIs alter gut bacteria in ways that could increase the risk for dangerous intestinal infections, adding to a body of research highlighting the drugs' adverse effects.

To figure out why people who take PPIs are more likely to get an intestinal infection, researchers at the University of Groningen and Maastricht University Medical Center in the Netherlands, as well as the Broad Institute of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, sequenced the bacterial DNA found in the fecal matter of 1,815 people. Doing so gave them a snapshot of the bacteria found in the subjects' intestines. A comparison of the profiles of subjects taking PPIs with those who were not revealed that, among other things, PPI users had less gut bacterial diversity.

The researchers, who published their results in the journal Gut, found that these differences existed even when PPI users did not have gastrointestinal conditions, which suggests that the differences were caused by the drugs rather than simply an artifact of disease. (PPIs are also prescribed to hospital ICU patients to prevent stress ulcers, among other uses.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers at King's College London, Cornell University and Columbia University obtained similar results from a comparably designed study as well as a small interventional study in which individuals' gut bacteria were analyzed before and after patients took PPIs for four to eight weeks.

PPIs may limit the gut's diversity by reducing its acidity and thus creating an environment that is more or less amenable to certain microbes. And that imbalance could then lead to infection, says Rinse Weersma, a gastroenterologist at the University of Groningen. The drugs may induce “a change in the microbiome that creates a niche where Salmonella or C. difficile can grow,” he explains.

Because a person's microbiome can also influence intestinal absorption of calcium and other vitamins and minerals, these drug-induced changes could explain why people who take PPIs are more likely to fracture certain bones and have nutritional deficiencies. Although no one yet knows how concerned long-term PPI users should be, one thing is for sure: “There should be ongoing dialogue and management between physicians and patients who take these drugs,” says Joel Heidelbaugh, a family physician at the University of Michigan who studies PPI overuse. “There are thousands of patients who are on these drugs indefinitely without needing to be.”

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Heartburn Meds Alter the Gut” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 5 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0516-17

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe