Heat Deaths in New York City Predicted to Rise

Global warming will bring more killer heat waves to the Big Apple, according to a new study

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Residents of Manhattan will not just sweat harder from rising temperatures in the future, says a new study; many may die.

Researchers at Columbia University estimate deaths linked to warming climate may rise some 20 percent by the 2020s, and, in some worst-case scenarios, 90 percent or more 70 years hence.

Higher winter temperatures may partially offset heat-related deaths by cutting cold-related mortality, but even so, scientists say annual net temperature-related deaths might go up a third.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study, published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change, was done by a team at the school's Earth Institute and the Mailman School of Public Health.

Studies of other cities have already projected adverse health effects from rising temperatures.

"This serves as a reminder that heat events are one of the greatest hazards faced by urban populations around the globe," said coauthor Radley Horton, a climate scientist at the Earth Institute's Center for Climate Systems Research.

The record 2010 heat wave that hit Russia, killing some 55,000 people, and the 2003 one in Europe that killed 70,000 are potent examples of the devastation that extreme heat can cause, Horton added.

Daily records from Manhattan's Central Park show that average monthly temperatures increased by 3.6º Fahrenheit from 1901 to 2000 – substantially more than the global and U.S. trends. Cities tend to concentrate heat; buildings and pavement soak it up during the day and give it off at night.

Many records have been set in Manhattan recently. 2012 was the borough's warmest year on record; in each of the past three years, it has seen temperatures at or above 100ºF. Projections for the future vary, but all foresee steep future average increases of 3.3ºF to 4.2ºF by the 2050s, and up to 7.1ºF by the 2080s.

Assuming Manhattan's current population of 1.6 million remains the same, the worst-case scenario translates to more than 1,000 annual deaths.

The study also found that the largest percentage increase in deaths would come not during the traditionally sweltering months of June through August, but rather in May and September – periods that are now generally pleasant, but which will probably increasingly become incorporated into the brutal dog days of summer.

Senior author Patrick Kinney, an environmental scientist at the Mailman School and Earth Institute faculty member, cautioned that things could be made better or worse by demographic trends and by how well New York adapts its infrastructure and policies to a warmer world.

New York is already a leader in efforts to mitigate warming, by planting trees, making surfaces such as roofs more reflective and opening air-conditioned centers where people can come to cool off. Even as city heat rose during the latter 20th century, some evidence suggests that heat-related deaths went down, Kinney noted, probably due to the introduction of home air conditioning.

"This points to the need for cities to look for ways to make themselves and their people more resilient to heat," he said.

This article originally appeared at The Daily Climate, the climate change news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe