New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Heat Puts the Squeeze on Bees

As climate warms, bumble bees leave southern locations but do not venture north

A buff-tailed bumblebee visits a catmint flower.

Jeremy T. Kerr

Bumblebees are already stressed by pesticides and habitat loss. Now add global warming. A new, large study of North America and Europe shows that rising atmospheric temperatures are shrinking the geographic range across which wild bumblebees live. The insects are disappearing from their southernmost regions as those places heat up. But they are not migrating farther northward as higher latitudes warm.

“That is the surprise,” says Leif Richardson, a research fellow in ecological economics at the University of Vermont who co-led the research. “We don’t yet understand why the bees are not responding the way other organisms are.” The general pattern among other insects, he says, “is that they are expanding farther north but have not lost much ground in the south.” The same holds true for many types of animals.

Richardson and his fellow investigators examined more than 400,000 historical and current records of bee movements to chart the range of 67 bumblebee species across the past 113 years. In each 10-year period since 1974 the southern limit in both North America and Europe has retreated; it is now about 300 kilometers farther northward than it was during a baseline period of 1901 to 1974.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As the researchers point out in the study, which was published in the July 10 Science, the southern migration and northern stall are independent of changes in land use or pesticide application.

The investigators say no one has a good explanation for either trend. Experts speculate that bees evolved in temperate regions and may therefore be less able to adapt to rising temperatures at either edge of their range. Many insects, such as butterflies, evolved in the tropics, which would explain why they persist as southern climates get warmer and why they move into northern climes that heat up as well.

In hotter southern regions, especially Europe, bumblebees do seem to be moving to higher altitudes in search of cooler climes. But that path is obviously limited. Oddly, at the northern fringes of the ranges, bees are moving down in elevation, even though that would generally be toward even warmer temperatures. Richardson says the bees might be driven out as plants that they prefer, such as flowers, decline at high elevations and are replaced by other vegetation such as trees that bees do not visit.

Wild bees are great pollinators. Losing them in the south could threaten all sorts of flowers and plants, hurting ecosystems and lessening food for animals. Their disappearance would harm agriculture as well; although beekeepers truck cultivated bees from farm to farm, many farmers rely on wild bees to pollinate crops and grazing fields. The worry, of course, is that if temperatures continue to rise, bees will disappear from more and more stretches of North America and Europe. And if the insects do not move northward, it may also be difficult for crops and plants that begin to grow there to flourish.

Some experts say the solution is assisted migration—helping the bees move to a new area they would not normally move to—a tactic that has been discussed and tried with other kinds of animals. “We don't have too much experience with assisted migration for bees, however,” Richardson says, “and it’s bound to be very expensive.” The approach might work for local farming communities, he acknowledges, “but it’s not viable across an entire continent.”

Smaller steps could help local bee populations do better, Richardson says. For example, most bumblebees nest in cavities in the ground, but changing climate might scare off animals that create these cavities. In that case, people could put out nesting boxes or maintain hedgerows and edges of crop fields where the cavities tend to form naturally.

Richardson stresses that the results thus far come from studying existing data. “What we need now are vigorous experiments to see what it is about changing climate that is really affecting the bees,” he says. “Are heat waves the big factor, for example? Or warmer temperatures during a specific period, such as nesting time or dormancy over winter?” These details might reveal other solutions or at least help experts predict when bees might leave an area for good. Some of that work is just beginning.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe