New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ice Volcanoes Could Be on Pluto

New Horizons mission finds evidence for cryovolcanism on the distant dwarf planet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Two icy volcanoes may lurk near Pluto’s south pole, images from NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft suggest.

The images show two mountains roughly circular in shape and with deep depressions in their centers. One, Wright Mons, is 3 to 5 kilometres high, while the other, Piccard Mons, is up to 6 kilometres high.

They resemble icy volcanoes, known as cryovolcanoes, on Neptune’s moon Triton and other frozen worlds.  Flowing ice, rather than hot lava, fuels cryovolcanoes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We’re not yet ready to announce we have found volcanic constructs at Pluto, but these sure look suspicious and we’re looking at them very closely,” says Jeff Moore, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, who heads the New Horizons geology team. Moore spoke on November 9 at the American Astronomical Society’s Division for Planetary Sciences meeting in National Harbor, Maryland.

If Pluto does indeed have cryovolcanoes, it suggests the volatile ices that coat its surface can flow relatively easily both at the surface and just below it, says Robert Pappalardo, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.

Much of the rest of Pluto’s surface is geologically active, with towering mountains and smooth icy plains. All that activity suggests that some internal heat source—most likely the radioactive decay of elements left over from Pluto’s birth, 4.5 billion years ago—keeps things warm enough to flow.

Atmosphere puzzle solved?
But cryovolcanoes would require enough heat to send slush from Pluto's depths squirting through its icy surface. On Triton, the gravitational pull of nearby Neptune flexes the moon and produces enough frictional heat to sustain the icy volcanoes, says Carly Howett, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and a New Horizons team member. It’s less clear whether Pluto has enough internal heat to sustain cryovolcanoes.

Other possible explanations for the Wright and Piccard mountains include tectonic activity that does not involve volcanoes. Jupiter's moon Ganymede also has cryovolcanic-like features that are not fully understood, Pappalardo says.

At the meeting, team members began unveiling other new findings from New Horizons. They include an apparent reconciliation of one of the biggest early puzzles of New Horizons: how thick Pluto's atmosphere is. Before New Horizons' July 14flyby, researchers on the ground measured the atmospheric pressure tens of kilometres above Pluto's surface by watching how the atmosphere dimmed and flickered as the dwarf planet passed in front of nearby stars. At Pluto, New Horizons used a similar method to measure the pressure down at Pluto’s surface. The New Horizons data showed a much lower pressure at the surface than would be expected by extrapolating from the measurements higher in the atmosphere.

Now, it seems that the apparent discrepancy can be reconciled. Pluto’s atmosphere turns out to be thinner and colder than expected at high altitudes, says Randy Gladstone, a New Horizons team member at the Southwest Research Institute’s San Antonio office. By adjusting the temperature models that explain how pressure at altitude translates to pressure at the surface, researchers were able to bring them into line.

“Going in I had this cute idea of how Pluto’s atmosphere worked,” says Gladstone. “That’s not happening.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on November 9, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe