Instant Egghead: How do geysers erupt over and over?

Geologists release the most detailed data set yet on the explosive choreography between water and steam

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yellowstone National Park's Old Faithful mystifies and delights tourists with its recurrent eruptions. But because of its popularity, it is heavily protected: the government limits access to curious scientists and restricts experiments on its plumbing. At least 80 smaller but equally percussive geysers also burst forth in Chile's Atacama Desert, offering an analogous opportunity to probe the earth's inner workings. Geologists laden with temperature and pressure sensors, GoPro cameras and a host of other gadgets recently observed one such geyser, nicknamed El Jefe, over the course of five days and more than 3,500 eruptions—one every 132 seconds. The result? The most detailed data set yet on the explosive choreography between water and steam.

El Jefe's flare-ups occur more regularly than those at many other geysers, but the plumbing is largely the same: a deep underground reservoir of water feeding a narrow channel that leads to the surface. As heat from the earth's core transfers to the reservoir, bubbles of steam rise through the water and up through the channel until they are caught in a small side chamber, a “bubble trap.” When enough steam collects there, it escapes and, with water, overflows the geyser's top. Eventually these escaping bubbles make the water in the channel so hot that it boils and triggers a full eruption; the low pressure from the boiling water at the top of the column starts a downward-propagating reaction that lowers the boiling point of the water underneath so that steam and hot water from the whole column shoot up all at once. (These stages, followed by a recharge stage when the water filters back down into the reservoir to resume cycling, are shown in the group's laboratory model above.) The observations were published in February in the Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

The measurements, taken at a range of depths, will yield a better understanding of the geyser's cycle and boiling patterns, says Michael Manga, a geologist on the El Jefe project at the University of California, Berkeley. Previous studies had captured either pressure or temperature, but both are necessary to gain insights into how heat travels through water below the earth's surface. Steven Ingebritsen, a researcher at the U.S. Geological Survey, is intrigued by what this more complete picture of geysers can tell geologists about other geothermal phenomena, such as volcanoes, which operate primarily underground and are incredibly challenging to probe—instruments would melt, for starters. The same flow of magma below the surface powers both types of eruptions. “They got their probes as deep as was feasible,” Ingebritsen says. “But you wonder what's going on down deeper.”

Sarah Lewin Frasier is a senior editor at Scientific American. She plans, assigns and edits the Advances section of the monthly magazine, as well as editing online news, and she launched Scientific American’s Games section in 2024. Before joining Scientific American in 2019, she chronicled humanity’s journey to the stars as associate editor at Space.com. (And even earlier, she was a print intern at Scientific American.) Frasier holds an A.B. in mathematics from Brown University and an M.A. in journalism from New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She enjoys musical theater and mathematical paper craft.

More by Sarah Lewin Frasier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Right on Schedule” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 5 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0515-27

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe