"Invisibility Cloak" Hides Cats and Fish

An arrangement of glass prisms routes light around an object but cannot hide itself

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A fish swims into an enclosure and disappears, while the pondweed behind remains perfectly visible. A cat climbs into a glass box and vanishes, and again the scene behind the box remains visible through the glass. This latest addition to the science of invisibility cloaks is one of the simplest implementations so far, but there’s no denying its striking impact.

The ‘box of invisibility’ has been designed by a team of researchers at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China, led by Hongsheng Chen, and their coworkers. The box is basically a set of prisms made from high-quality optical glass that bend light around any object in the enclosure around which the prisms are arrayed, the researchers describe in a paper posted on the online repository arXiv.

Chen and his coworker Bin Zheng first unveiled the principle last year with a six wedge-shaped prisms arranged to form a hexagon that could hide small objects. The researchers now used a similar but larger hexagon of prisms placed in a fish tank. As a fish swims through the central hole, it disappears while the pondweed behind the cloak remains perfectly visible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A second demonstration uses a square arrangement of eight prisms with a central cavity large enough for a cat to climb inside. The researchers project a movie through the cloak and onto a screen behind it. Seen from the front, parts of the cat vanish as it sits in the cavity or pokes its head inside, while the scene behind — a field of flowers, with a butterfly flitting between them — can be seen through the glass (see figure below and video at bottom).

An arrangement of glass prisms routes light around the space inside the cloak, so that an observer sees the scene on the screen as if the cat were not there.
Image: Courtesy of Nature magazine

As well as being visible themselves, these cloaks only work for certain viewing directions. A sophisticated observer would also be able to measure that different rays of light have traveled different distances inside the device.

As such, the trick is arguably closer to ‘disappearances’ staged in Victorian music hall using arrangements of slanted mirrors than to the modern use of substances called metamaterials to achieve invisibility by guiding light rays in unnatural ways. These are materials made from arrays of electrically conducting components that interact with light so as to create exotic optical effects such as negative refractive index.

In principle, metamaterials can create ‘perfect’ cloaking — which makes the cloak itself invisible as well as its contents. Metamaterials that work at the wavelengths of visible light are very hard to make, however. Chen’s coworker Baile Zhang of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, as well as John Pendry at Imperial College London, and their coworkers have shown that a compromise of partial visible-light cloaking of macroscopic objects can be attained using blocks of transparent materials such as calcite crystal, in which light propagates at different speeds in different directions.

These partial cloaks will hide objects but remain visible themselves. “Everyone would like to have a cloak that hides big, real-world objects from visible light, but achieving this demands some compromises of the ideal theory”, Pendry explains.

He says that Chen and colleagues have now gone “further than most” with such compromises by abandoning any concern to preserve phase relationships in the transmitted light, Pendry says. “As a result the authors can report quite a large cloak that operates over most of the visible spectrum.”

Chen and colleagues write that such a simplification is warranted for many applications, for example in security and surveillance, where one might imagine hiding an observer in a glass compartment that looks empty.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on June 11, 2013.

Philip Ball is a science writer and author based in London. His latest book is How Life Works (University of Chicago Press, 2023).

More by Philip Ball

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe