New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Kids These Days Really Are More Egocentric

But coming of age during a recession could temper that rising trend

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Each generation thinks the next one is more self-centered. A recent study published in Personality and Individual Differences supports this perception: American society has steadily become more egocentric since the nation's beginnings. An overall rise in economic prosperity may play a role in this egotism, according to a different study: people who were young adults during hard times are less narcissistic than those who came of age during economic booms.

To measure trends in egocentrism, researchers at the University of Michigan analyzed the text of State of the Union Addresses from 1790 to 2012. They calculated an “egocentricity index” for each speech by comparing the number of words that indicated self-interest (such as “me,” “we” or “mother”) with the number of words that showed high levels of interest in others (such as “he,” “neighbor” or “friend”). Not only did they find a steady increase in the use of self-interest words in the annual speeches over time, their analysis also revealed that before 1900, the speeches almost always used more other-interest words. After 1920, nearly every speech used more self-interest words.

To see if a president's speeches reflect egotism in American society at large, the team compared its results to studies of egotism in other cultural products, such as 20th-century books and songs. The researchers found rising egotism across the board. “This result tells me it's bigger than just a president,” says Sara Konrath, a co-author of the paper and a professor at the Institute for Social Research at Michigan.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a related but independent study published in July in Psychological Science, Emily Bianchi, a professor at Emory University's Goizueta Business School, looked at how the state of the nation's economy affected individual levels of narcissism. Bianchi used two types of personality tests to measure the narcissism of 32,632 participants aged 18 to 83. She found that people who were between 18 and 25 years old during hard economic times, as measured by unemployment rates, were less narcissistic later in life than those who came of age during economic booms. The same was not true for other age groups. Bianchi reasons that the difference exists because early adulthood is formative. Inexperienced employees are the most vulnerable during a recession; how much one struggles to establish a professional identity has a lasting impact.

In the final part of her study, Bianchi looked at CEO compensation relative to other executives. “It's a well-validated indicator of narcissism,” Bianchi explains. “A CEO has control over how much the second most senior person gets paid.” Using data from 2,095 CEOs, she found that those who were emerging adults during economic booms had a compensation that was 2.3 times higher than their second top executive, versus a difference of 1.7 for those who came of age in less prosperous times. As such, she believes the recent recession of 2008 and 2009 and its lasting effects on the job market will probably temper narcissistic tendencies in today's young adults—a dip in an overall rising trend.

SA Mind Vol 25 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Kids These Days Really Are More Egocentric” in SA Mind Vol. 25 No. 6 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1114-10a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe