Laser Can Identify Explosives from Afar

Scattered light was used to reveal the composition of dangerous powders from up to 1 kilometer away

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Lasers can be used to identify chemical powders such as explosives or fertilizers from hundreds of meters away, a team of researchers reports in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The authors exploited a technique called Raman spectroscopy, in which a laser sets molecules in a substance vibrating, twisting and wagging. The molecules then re-emit, or scatter, photons of slightly lower energies than the incoming ones. The difference in the energy is determined by the properties of the molecules, and thus the scattered photons carry a unique fingerprint of the substance.

But Raman spectroscopy suffers from a major drawback — the scattered signal is weak, meaning that light is ordinarily difficult to collect even tens of meters away from a sample. So most experts did not think that it would be feasible over longer distances, says Vladislav Yakovlev, a physicist at Texas A&M University in College Station. “All the conventional ways of trying to do this remote chemical sensing basically failed at distances beyond 50 meters or so,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To boost the signal, Yakovlev's team turned the sample itself into a laser. Whereas a normal laser traps light with mirrors that reflect the beam, a fine powder can trap light within its dancing particles, which then scatter the photons. At a critical threshold of the incoming light's intensity, the signal is exponentially amplified, and the laser light imprinted with the chemical’s signature emerges from the sample in all directions.

The phenomenon is called random lasing, and the researchers report that they used it to identify a variety of chemicals that have been found in improvised explosive devices (including ammonium nitrate, sodium nitrate, and potassium chorlate) in lab tests in which the laser beams travelled nearly 400 meters, reflected by a series of mirrors. They calculate that if they could eliminate the mirrors — which absorb some of the light — they could achieve a straight-line detection distance of 1 kilometer.

In demand
One major limitation is that the technique requires materials to be in powder form. Still, the research offers potential military and security applications, including identifying explosives and roadside bombs, says Ali Passian, a physicist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, who was not involved with the study. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, he says, “we’ve been bombarded by calls from different defence agencies to do exactly this”.

Passian cautions that success in the laboratory does not always translate to the field. Dust, wind and rising warm air could weaken and distort the laser beams — both to and from the sample. Furthermore, it is not clear how much powder must be present for the detection to work, or in what concentration. If a hazardous powder is mixed into soil, it will be much more difficult to detect, says Passian.

The latest work was supported in part by the US Air Force and conducted at its research facilities in San Antonio, Texas. The study’s authors declined to discuss whether the Air Force has plans to develop the findings, but they suggest other possible uses, such as monitoring farmland and measuring the presence of fertilizing nitrates in soil. Identifying human remains — such as in mass graves — is another area of interest, says Yakovlev, albeit one that the team has not yet considered.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 11, 2014.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe