New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Last Call: Will WIMPs Show Their Faces in the Latest Dark Matter Experiment

The most sensitive detector yet revs up in March—and there’s a lot on the line

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It's now or never for physicists' favorite explanation of dark matter, the invisible material that seems to pervade the universe. The largest, most sensitive search yet for the particles many physicists think make up dark matter—weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs)—will begin in March at the XENON1T experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy.

The project is the latest in a line of detectors that date back as early as the 1980s but have all failed so far to find dark matter. If the elusive particles go unfound in the next few years at XENON1T, physicists may have to abandon the leading theory and search for more exotic explanations. “Our best models are within reach of XENON1T,” says Rafael Lang, a physicist at Purdue University who works on the experiment. “If we don't see it, that means our ideas are completely wrong, and we really have to go back to the drawing board.”

WIMPs are a prediction of superstring theory. This extension of the Standard Model of particle physics proposes the existence of partner particles for all the known fundamental bits of matter in the universe. WIMPs would be the lightest of these partners, and physicists favor them because the theory naturally predicts just about the amount of dark matter that experts know must exist because of its gravitational pull. (Dark matter represents an estimated 84 percent of all matter in the cosmos.) Many versions of WIMPs have already been ruled out because previous searches for them turned up nothing, but investigators are still hopeful that one of the remaining possibilities will show up.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Buried in a cave 1,400 meters underground, XENON1T houses a large cylindrical vat filled with 3,500 kilograms of liquid xenon. The substance naturally gives off light when its atoms are disturbed; scientists are aiming to catch the rare occasion when a dark matter particle collides with a xenon nucleus, an impact that should leave a unique energy signal. Although dark matter is thought to be ubiquitous—roughly 100,000 dark particles fly through every square centimeter of space each second—it almost never interacts with regular matter and generally makes its presence known only through gravity. After the planned two-year search at XENON1T, the detection of just 10 particles that appear to match dark matter's predicted properties would be enough to claim a discovery.

The $15-million project, sponsored by a collaboration among 10 different countries, follows a previous iteration of the experiment that was 25 times smaller. The new XENON's larger collecting volume, as well as improved shielding to block other particles that might masquerade as dark matter, should allow it to surpass the earlier experiment's level of sensitivity within two days of turning on. It should also overtake the current leading dark matter experiment, the 370-kilogram Large Underground Xenon experiment (LUX) in South Dakota, within weeks. “I would not at all be surprised if XENON1T were able to make a discovery that had just barely escaped the generations of experiments that came before it,” says Tim Tait, a theorist at the University of California, Irvine, who is not involved in the experiments.

Meanwhile WIMPs could also show up any day now at the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, where protons crash into one another at near the speed of light to give rise to new particles. The accelerator began a second run last year at almost twice the energy with which it turned on in 2009 and now should be powerful enough to create roughly the same range of WIMPs that might be detectable at XENON1T.

And if in the next few years, neither of them sees a hint of the particles, the time may come for theorists to move on to another explanation for dark matter. “On one hand, we know it exists, but on the other hand, we know very little about it, so it's very easy to theorize about possibilities,” Tait says. “If we don't see it, that tells us the dark matter has turned out to be more weird and wonderful than we had originally guessed it might be.”

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Last Call: Will WIMPs Show Their Faces?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 2 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0216-12

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe