Learn Faster with Messy Moves

People whose movements are more variable pick up new motor skills more quickly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whether learning to write, swing a golf club or play the violin, even the most good-natured students become frustrated by inevitable mistakes. Such off-target actions were thought to reflect neural noise in the parts of the brain controlling movement—something a good dose of practice would stamp out. But a new study, published January 12 in Nature Neuroscience, finds that these inconsistencies are not always obstacles to be overcome but rather key ingredients to learning.

Study participants learned to copy a displayed curved line without seeing what their hand was doing. Initially these lines were off the mark for everyone, but some people produced more erratic curves than others did. During training each curve was scored on how well it copied the target curve. All participants gradually produced more accurate curves over hundreds of trials, but those who started out with the most variability before training attained accurate curves more quickly than individuals who began with little irregularity. Another experiment bolstered this link: when researchers promoted variability in one aspect of a movement by applying a force field that pushed the participants' hand off target, they learned the motion faster.

Bigger fluctuations may reflect a brain exploring the full spectrum of possible actions, which would narrow in on accurate movements more quickly than a restricted search. Study author Maurice Smith, a neuroscientist at Harvard University, suggests profiling a person's range of movements after a stroke to aid their rehabilitation. “You could focus training on the types of tasks they are most likely to learn well, as predicted from their variability,” he says. For the rest of us, the results mean we should try not to get frustrated with wild misses when we are learning a new activity. That clumsiness could be the key to quick improvement.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe