See Inside December 2006


The August issue garnered much interest--that is, vigorous reader dissent, questions and analysis. Although most letter writers welcomed guest essayist Mihail C. Roco's optimistic look at nanotechnology in "Nanotechnology's Future" [Forum], some issued thoughtful caveats about its unforeseen dangers.

The bulk of the dissent, however, was reserved for the cover story "The Expert Mind," by Philip E. Ross, which suggested that studies of the development of chess grandmasters' mental processes may reveal how expertise in all fields is fostered. For those readers who assume that innate ability is the foundation of great achievement, Ross cited research--relating to motivation and the ability to "chunk" information--indicating that experts are made, not born. Much of the criticism was echoed by Doug Jannusch of Kaneohe, Hawaii: "This is an insufficient dismissal of the role of talent in music, chess and sports," its greatest shortfall being "the lack of explanation for the role of intelligence in determining success. Let's face it--some people are simply smarter, faster or stronger than others."

This is only a preview. Get the rest of this article now!

Select an option below:

Customer Sign In

*You must have purchased this issue or have a qualifying subscription to access this content

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on
Click here to access this article in its entirety through site license access.

Share this Article:


You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.
Scientific American Holiday Sale

Scientific American Mind Digital

Get 6 bi-monthly digital issues
+ 1yr of archive access for just $9.99

Hurry this offer ends soon! >


Email this Article


Next Article