New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lice No Longer Stopped by Common Drugstore Remedies

The bugs have developed resistance to two common treatments 

Male human head louse.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Lisa Rapaport

(Reuters Health) - Many common over-the-counter lice remedies are no longer effective, according to a study that has some doctors recommending prescription remedies instead.

Two non-prescription options in - permethrin (Nix) and synergized pyrethrins (Rid) - can no longer keep lice away, said Dr. William Ryan, one of the study authors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"For decades they have been widely and easily available and have been used over and over, and it is inevitable that resistance will emerge when that happens," said Ryan, former head of development at Sklice, a maker of prescription lice lotion.

"Even worse, when people see they don't work, they keep re-treating, so that all the repeated use just makes the head lice increasingly resistant," Ryan added by email.

Ryan and colleagues examined data from previously completed research on lice remedies available in the U.S. through October 2015.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, medicines like Nix and Rid were usually effective after just one treatment, the research review found. Some studies found these remedies 100 percent effective as recently as 1998.

But after that, studies often found these treatments cleared up lice with a single use less than half of the time.

One study in 2009 found they worked in a single use just 26 percent of the time, or about as effective as a placebo, Ryan said.

Home remedies such as petroleum jelly, mayonnaise and essential oils, have not been demonstrated as safe or effective, the research review also found.

At the same time, several prescription products were effective with a single application even without the tedious process of combing out nits by hand, the analysis found. These included malathion, spinosad and topical ivermectin.

Another prescription remedy, benzyl alcohol, worked without nit combing with two applications.

Although combing is appropriate to remove dead lice and eggs, rigorous combing may only be something parents need to do for cosmetic reasons, the authors conclude.

One limitation of the study is that some of the over-the-counter remedies are much older, which may have allowed more time for lice to develop resistance to the products.

While prescription options may be better, they're also much more expensive, noted Dr. Barbara Frankowski, a pediatrics researcher at the University of Vermont Children's Hospital in Burlington who wasn't involved in the study.

"They are all VERY expensive - some well over $100 for a single treatment - and certain insurance companies will only cover certain products, often with an extremely high co-pay," Frankowski said by email. "If you don't have insurance that covers prescriptions, and you are not rich, you are out of luck!"

It may be reasonable for parents to try over-the-counter products first, as long as they are certain their kids have lice and they use it at least twice at 7 to 10 day intervals, said Dr. Bernard Cohen, a pediatrics and dermatology researcher at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore who wasn't involved in the study.

"Consider the prescription products if this does not work in a timely fashion," Cohen said by email.

It's also important to check the whole family for lice when one person gets infested, Cohen added.

"Close physical contact is the most common way of acquiring lice, since they do not fly or jump," Cohen said. "I still think that one of the most common problems is not identifying close contacts who are infested and treating them appropriately," he said.

"After treatment, I recommend not sharing combs, brushes, or hats with anyone else and avoiding contact with those who might be sources who have not been treated," Cohen added.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe