Blinded by the Light: Wrecked Up by Our Juice, Another Citizen of the Night [Slide Show]

Light pollution is blurring out the night sky

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Have you ever seen the Milky Way? Maybe, but have you ever seen it while standing in the Great White Way—or any Great White Way: Times Square, Piccadilly Circus, or Akihabara? A citizen science research project known as the GLOBE at Night suggests that much of urban humanity—which now constitutes more than half the 7 billion people on the planet—cannot observe the opalescent band of stars, our galactic home, in the vast void of the universe. Instead, we confront a yellowish haze that constitutes modern night, pricked by the occasional extra-bright star or planet.

The problem, of course, is artificial illumination that makes night into day.

In a bid to better understand the extent of light pollution, an international consortium of researchers has used satellite data to map artificial light around the world by capturing cross-sectional slices of atmosphere. The most light-polluted areas are major cities, of course, whether the megalopolis that stretches from Boston to Washington, D.C., or the glittering lights of Shanghai's Bund. The map might serve to better locate ground-based telescopes and other instruments for observing the nocturnal firmament, among other dark sky concerns such as animal behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


View a slideshow of global light pollution.

There are still refuges of darkness. The International Dark Sky Association dubbed Death Valley National Park in California the world's largest dark sky park in February, thanks to its distance from the largest cities of the U.S. Southwest.

"Death Valley is a place to gaze in awe at the expanse of the Milky Way, follow a lunar eclipse, track a meteor shower, or simply reflect on your place in the universe," said U.S. National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis in announcing the designation.

Other escapes range from Namibia to New Mexico, but they are dwindling, according to the new maps. While light pollution is a sign of progress—access to light at night afforded by electricity—it is also a record of waste: artificial lights point up rather than solely illuminating what lies beneath. The solution is simple—better lighting design—and has the extra benefit of saving energy. "The light is going in the wrong direction," observed Steven Chu, former U.S. Secretary of Energy, in Copenhagen for the climate conference there in 2009 while standing in front of a projection of the nighttime spread of cities across the globe. "It should be going down, not up."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe