New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Liquid-Propellant Rocket Development

THE author of the accompanying article is the dean of scientific experimenters on the high efficiency rocket as a means of propulsion wholly independent of the air—a reaction motor. He began theoretical work in 1912 when an instructor in physics at Princeton, patented a "rocket apparatus" in 1914 (U.S. Patents No. 1,102,653 and 1,103,503), made actual experiments in 1915 when an assistant professor of physics at Clark University, and in 1919 the Smithsonian Institution published his first progress paper, "A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes," describing his preliminary experiments. He is now Director of the Physics Laboratory at the same university. The accompanying paper is published by permission of the Smithsonian Institution, and is Dr. Goddard's second official progress paper on his work. It is conservative; the author never has been inclined to rush into print with hopes and great expectations, and even now he describes only what has actually been accomplished in his experiments. In a recent editorial comment, Nature (London), the world's foremost non-popular journal of general science, states: "It is good to hear that such experiments are being carried out, and the sober objectivity of Dr. Goddard's work presents a sharp contrast to the unscientific imagination exhibited by those who seek to direct attention to the advent of interplanetary travel before the preliminary investigations that might throw light upon its possibility or otherwise have been completed." Some other writers on rocketry are far ahead of Dr. Goddard and almost, in fact, on Mars already-in books.—The Editor.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

00
Scientific American Magazine Vol 155 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Liquid-Propellant Rocket Development” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 155 No. 2 (), p. 78
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0836-78

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe