New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Massachusetts Town Stubs Out Plan to Ban Tobacco Sales

The town of Westminster's proposal to ban tobacco sales generated strong opposition from store owners who claimed that it would cut into sales

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

(Reuters) - A Massachusetts town on Wednesday stubbed out a proposal that apparently would have made it the first in the United States to ban tobacco sales, a newspaper reported.

The proposal in Westminster, a town of about 7,300 people 60 miles (97 km) northwest of Boston, had generated strong opposition from store owners who contended the ban would cut into sales.

The Fitchburg Sentinel & Enterprise newspaper reported that the Westminister Board of Health voted 2-1 to turn down the proposal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Board member Ed Simoncini moved to remove the regulation from consideration, and member Peter Munro seconded his motion, the newspaper said.

"The town is not in favor of the proposal, and therefore I am not in favor of the proposal," Simoncini said.

He and Munro voted in favor of killing the proposal, and Board Chair Andrea Crete voted against it, the Sentinel & Enterprise said.

Attempts to reach the board members were unsuccessful. Supporters had argued that the tobacco ban would protect public health.

Restrictions on smoking in specific settings have proliferated around the United States. But Westminster appeared to be the first to consider a town-wide ban on the sale of all tobacco products.

 

(Writing by Ian Simpson; Editing by Eric Walsh)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe