Massachusetts Town Stubs Out Plan to Ban Tobacco Sales

The town of Westminster's proposal to ban tobacco sales generated strong opposition from store owners who claimed that it would cut into sales

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

(Reuters) - A Massachusetts town on Wednesday stubbed out a proposal that apparently would have made it the first in the United States to ban tobacco sales, a newspaper reported.

The proposal in Westminster, a town of about 7,300 people 60 miles (97 km) northwest of Boston, had generated strong opposition from store owners who contended the ban would cut into sales.

The Fitchburg Sentinel & Enterprise newspaper reported that the Westminister Board of Health voted 2-1 to turn down the proposal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Board member Ed Simoncini moved to remove the regulation from consideration, and member Peter Munro seconded his motion, the newspaper said.

"The town is not in favor of the proposal, and therefore I am not in favor of the proposal," Simoncini said.

He and Munro voted in favor of killing the proposal, and Board Chair Andrea Crete voted against it, the Sentinel & Enterprise said.

Attempts to reach the board members were unsuccessful. Supporters had argued that the tobacco ban would protect public health.

Restrictions on smoking in specific settings have proliferated around the United States. But Westminster appeared to be the first to consider a town-wide ban on the sale of all tobacco products.

 

(Writing by Ian Simpson; Editing by Eric Walsh)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe