New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Measles by the Numbers

The U.S. media is abuzz due to an outbreak at Disneyland in California, but the disease will keep popping up until it is wiped out worldwide

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Measles debate has reached fever pitch in the United States after an outbreak that began in December at Disneyland in southern California. Many media outlets and politicians have focused on the country’s growing anti-vaccination movement. However, the bigger problem lies elsewhere. The United States was declared free of measles in 2000, and all outbreaks since then have been sparked by imported cases, which will continue to occur until measles is eradicated worldwide.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has set targets for 2015, but progress towards them has been slow (see ‘Targets in trouble’). After the Measles & Rubella Initiative was founded in 2001, the number of cases and deaths fell. But progress against the disease started to stall in 2007 (see ‘A fall … then a stall’) and vaccination coverage plateaued in 2010, when funding plummeted during the global economic slowdown (see ‘Vaccination rising’). The WHO now concedes that few countries will attain anywhere near the targets.

The United States has some grounds for concern. Last year saw 644 cases in 27 states, a record high since 2000. And by 2013, the proportion of eligible children who had been vaccinated had dropped by 2% since 2004, to 91%. But the nation’s vaccination coverage remains high compared with other countries (see ‘Vaccination coverage worldwide’), and the number of cases is also small. The recent US outbreak infected 121 people. But China saw 107,000 people infected last year, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) had 89,000 cases in 2013 (see ‘Largest outbreaks’). The proportion of people who die varies depending on where you are (see ‘Different conditions, different disease’).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The last pockets of a disease are always the hardest to eliminate, as shown by polio eradication, which has been ‘just around the corner’ for years. But if the Measles & Rubella Initiative can get vaccinations back on track worldwide, measles may yet follow smallpox, the only killer human disease yet to be wiped out in the wild.
 

Source: WHO. Design: Jasiek Krzysztofiak/NATURE

 

Source: WHO. Design: Jasiek Krzysztofiak/NATURE

 

 

 

 

 

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on February 11, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe