New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Mega-Heatwaves Mechanism Pinpointed

Two recent record hot spells have been traced to a feedback loop between dry soils and trapped air

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The 'mega-heatwaves' that parched Europe in 2003 and Russia in 2010 were exacerbated by a vicious feedback loop between soil and atmosphere, researchers report today in Nature Geoscience. Drying ground added more heat into air close to Earth's surface, a process that repeated over time to produce record-breaking warmth that shrivelled crops, set forests ablaze and claimed tens of thousands of lives.

Without the extraordinarily dry surface and the anomalous high-pressure conditions in the lowest level of the atmosphere occurring at the same time, the extreme, persistent hot spells wouldn’t have occurred, says paper co-author Diego Miralles, a climate hydrologist at Ghent University in Belgium.

Climate scientists looking for triggers of such events have identified high-pressure atmospheric patterns and a feedback loop between drying soil and rising air temperatures as probable suspects. But Miralles and his team clarified the interaction among these factors by analyzing a broader range of data, including temperature readings from weather balloons and satellite measurements of soil moisture taken before and during the heatwaves.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study shows that soil drying is the key link in the intensification of mega-heatwaves, says Dara Entekhabi, a hydrologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. The work “dissects the phenomena better than previous studies,” showing the anatomy and evolution of the extreme heat events, he adds.

Too hot to handle
Summer heatwaves arise when high-pressure systems linger over an area and trap heat near the ground. The result is clear skies, little rain and punishing temperatures until the system moves on, which can take days or weeks.

The mega-heatwaves began in a similar manner, with one key difference: each started over areas with low soil moisture. That soil became even drier in the initial heat, which then pumped more warmth into the air above. That heated surface air then rose into the atmospheric boundary layer — the lowest level of the troposphere — doubling its height to more than 4 kilometers, and creating a thick blanket of heat. The cycle began anew each morning.

“The heat doesn’t dissipate at night, so you start from where you left off the day before,” says Miralles.

The work could bolster climate modellers’ efforts to depict the way soil moisture and vegetation interact with the atmosphere, says Kevin Trenberth, a climatologist at the US National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.

But the study does not tell the whole story. Because it focused on local phenomena, the analysis cannot fully explain why a dome of high pressure stagnated in one place for so long in the European and Russian events. Nor does it address whether climate change will make mega-heatwaves more frequent or more intense.

Other studies suggest the probability of deadly heatwaves on this scale will become 5–10 times more likely in coming years. “If we expect to have more drier summers in the future,” says Miralles, “we will be more vulnerable to more mega-heatwaves.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 20, 2014.  

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe