New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Microbe Census Reveals Air Crawling with Bacteria

Thousands of microbes that change with the weather drift in the atmosphere

By David Biello

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The air is a hostile place for a microbe. Often dry, lacking in nutrients and filled with deadly ultraviolet radiation, the atmosphere would seem to be the last place a microbe would want to find itself. Yet, a new genetic census of some air samples from Austin and San Antonio, Tex., finds that as many as 2,000 different kinds of microbes may be present in the air we breathe on any given day.

Microbial ecologist Gary Andersen of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and his colleagues collected air samples in the two Texas cities over a period of 17 weeks, starting in 2003. They then used a specially designed microarray--a small chip roughly the size of a quarter that carries probes to detect specific genetic information--to search for a gene involved in the making of a protein (16S) that is found in many microbes. "We designed a 500,000-probe array to identify up to about 9,000 different groups of bacterial and archaean organisms," Andersen explains. "It looks at the differences in the 16S sequence to identify a specific type of prokaryotic organism."

In the air samples, the researchers uncovered at least 1,800 different types of microbes, including those such as the diarrhea-causing Arcobacter and ulcer-inducing Heliobacter genera that can be dangerous to human health. Previous efforts to determine microbe counts in the atmosphere had relied on culturing the air to see what grew. "Over 90 percent you can't recover even though it was not only present but viable," Andersen notes. "It's just something about the physiological state it gets in; when it's not in rich media, it has a different physiology."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This puts the diversity of microbes in the air on par with the diversity of microbes in the soil, a fertile environment for such life-forms. In fact, there is a large crossover between the microbes in the air of a city and the microbes in its soil. The ecologists found that airborne microbes were broadly the same in Austin and San Antonio as well, and varied more depending on the weather than any other factor.

The most common microbes included those that thrive in hay fields and deteriorating exterior paint, according to the paper published online December 18 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. "We were surprised at how many different types of sequences we were seeing," Andersen adds. "Obscure phyla, like TM7, which have been seen in soil and gum tissue; hot springs type organisms; and microbes from sewage treatment plants."

The census provides a background for ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to monitor city air for potential bioterrorism attacks as well as fills in a gaping hole in the understanding of where microbes persist. For example, storms of Saharan dust--and their attendant microbes--have been linked to local meningitis outbreaks and tracked across the Pacific to coral deaths and an increase in childhood asthma in the Caribbean. "It's important to do a microbial census to see what's in the air we breathe. I believe it's going to change as the climate changes," Andersen says. "We may see very different populations of microbes in the air and that may have some health implications."

The air is now being tested in at least 30 U.S. cities and Andersen hopes the effort will be broadened. "How is it in the middle of the oceans?" he asks. "Is it just what's coming up from the sea's surface or is it a long-range dispersal of organisms?" Whatever the case, fresh, clean, bacteria-free air is rarer than previously thought.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe