MIND Reviews: Falling into the Fire

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Falling into the Fire: A Psychiatrist's Encounters with the Mind in Crisis
by Christine Montross
Penguin Press HC, 2013

If Joan of Arc were alive today, she probably would not be heralded as a saint. The 15th-century French peasant girl instead would be institutionalized or put on heavy antipsychotic medications for claiming divine visions urging her to overthrow the English government. As our knowledge of the brain has advanced since those days, so, too, has our approach to treating mental illness. Yet we still face significant gaps in knowledge.

In Falling into the Fire, psychiatrist Montross describes her experience as a resident and attending physician in a hospital ward. Her tale reveals the incredible challenges psychiatrists face when trying to understand, diagnose and treat severely mentally ill patients.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Consider Eddie, a man who endured 25 elective cosmetic procedures in an attempt to rid his skin of acne, despite having no blemishes. Montross diagnosed Eddie with body dysmorphic disorder, a condition in which patients obsess about one aspect of their body, often checking their imagined affliction hundreds of times a day. Eddie refused the treatments Montross proposed, believing he would be better off saving his money for another plastic surgery. The episode left Montross feeling helpless. She lacked the tools to help difficult patients who reject sound judgment and potentially lifesaving treatment.

Eddie was not the only baffling case. One day a patient named Colin entered the clinic calmly stating he was Jesus. People claiming to be possessed by divine or demonic entities are not as rare as one might think. He showed many symptoms of a strange condition known as Jerusalem syndrome, which manifests most commonly in travelers who visit the Holy Land and suddenly begin wrapping themselves in tunics and preaching scripture.

When Montross saw him, Colin appeared harmless and blissful, but his girlfriend said he had been behaving strangely, such as urinating in soda bottles. Euphoria often opens the floodgates to psychosis, so before her shift ended, Montross sent Colin home with orders to take an antipsychotic. But her limited time with him and understanding of his illness precluded her from assessing the best course of treatment or ascertaining whether he was a threat to himself or others. Montross left the hospital that night feeling uneasy, thinking perhaps she had underestimated Colin's mental illness.

Reflecting on her experiences, Montross writes: “As psychiatrists, we see the mind while it careens and lists, and we are not always sure how—or whether—we can right it. How do we respond when a patient's suffering breeds unbearable discomfort and unease within our own selves?”

Many of the case studies leave the reader hanging. A psychiatric ward physician may see patients only once during their stay and never know what becomes of them later. Uncertainty comes with the territory. In psychiatry as in everyday life, there are no easy fixes or cures. Sometimes, Montross writes, empathy is the best or only tool at our disposal.

SA Mind Vol 24 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Illusive Brain” in SA Mind Vol. 24 No. 5 (), p. 72
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1113-72a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe