MIND Reviews: Roundup: Quirks and Quibbles


The Mind: Leading Scientists Explore the Brain, Memory, Consciousness, and Personality
Edited by John Brockman.                                                                                                          Harper Perennial, 2011 ($14.99)

As a research psychologist, when I see a book that claims to reveal “everything you need to know about the mind,” I keep my hopes up and my expectations low.

This new book, edited by legendary literary agent John Brockman, dashed most of my hopes. It contains conversations with 16 prominent neuroscientists, biologists and psychologists, but only one is female—a clue about one of the book’s flaws, namely, that much of its content is obsolete.

In the first chapter, for example, in a chat between Brockman and psychologist Steven Pinker of Harvard University, Pinker complains about theories of mind that are “decades out-of-date” while advancing an information-processing theory of the brain that is also out-of-date. This gaffe can be explained, perhaps, by the fact that the interview took place in 1997. Since that time, great strides have been made in neuroscience, which has gradually
been coming to grips with the fact that the brain works nothing like a computer, contrary to Pinker’s assertions. Fully half the interviews in this book took place in the 1990s—a serious problem when one is looking at one of the fastest-moving fields in all the sciences.

Also troubling, every chapter has long been available in unedited form on Brockman’s Web site,, created to be a forum where outstanding scholars and scientists could interact. As one might expect, the experts featured in the book are often talking to one another, not to the general public.

The biggest problem with the book, however, has to do with the diversity of topics it tackles. Eight of the book’s 18 chapters say nothing about either brain or mind, focusing instead on topics such as birth order, morality and even protozoan parasites. How these various forays are related to either mind or each other is unclear.

These negatives notwithstanding, if you want a quick introduction to some of the smartest and most interesting thinkers around—Stanislas Dehaene of the Collège de France in Paris, Vilayanur S. Ramachandran of the University of California, San Diego, Steven Rose of the Open University in Milton Keynes, England, and others—read this book or simply click on —Robert Epstein

Roundup: Quirks and Quibbles

Two books and one TV series explore the oddities of the human mind.

Extraordinarily complex as the human brain may be, it is far from perfect. Human memory is unreliable; we are easily swayed by advertisements; and we tend to hold fast to superstitions. In his new book Brain Bugs: How the Brain’s Flaws Shape Our Lives (W. W. Norton, 2011), neuroscientist Dean Buonomano explores these neural “bugs,” delving into studies that reveal why the brain may have developed some of its quirks.

Is it possible to directly observe the brain at work? In a thought-provoking read, psychologists Paolo Legrenzi and Carlo Umilta argue that the public has become unduly obsessed with brain imaging. Neuromania: On the Limits of Brain Science (Oxford University Press, 2011) debunks the budding idea that a study or news report accompanied by a colorful brain image is more reliable than research that does not use flashy functional MRI technology.

This article was originally published with the title "Reviews and Recommendations."

or subscribe to access other articles from the September 2011 publication.
Digital Issue $7.95
Digital Subscription $19.99 Subscribe
Share this Article:


You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

Email this Article