New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Mixing 2 Incompatible Chemicals in 1 Pot

New method—using water reactions to keep substances apart—could speed creation of important industrial compounds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers from the US have demonstrated a new catalyst support structure allowing two incompatible catalysts to work in tandem. The work mimics nature’s strategy of compartmentalising reactions and may open up new avenues for one pot syntheses for multi-step reactions.

One pot reactions are attractive because several steps take place in one vessel, in the same solvent. This reduces time and waste associated with purification between steps. However, catalysts for different stages of the synthesis may interfere if mixed together, preventing the desired product from forming. To overcome this problem, individual steps can be physically compartmentalised, often by fixing the catalysts to separate supports, so they cannot interact with each other.

Marcus Weck and his group from New York University have created a polymer support that forms spherical micelles with a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell. By introducing a cobalt complex into the core and a rhodium complex into the outer shell, the micelle can catalyse two reactions to transform alkynes into chiral alcohols. Reactions with the micelles demonstrate good selectivity and higher yields than either the stepwise reaction or with separate micelles containing each catalyst, which is attributed to the reaction intermediates diffusing easily between the two layers of the micelle.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Weck says his research was inspired by the reactions that occur in cells. ‘In nature, reactions with different conditions are placed into “pockets” in the cell, preventing the different reactants from flowing together and destroying each other,’ he explains. ‘We wanted to apply this idea to transition metal catalysis.’

Unlike biological catalysts, which rely on complex protein folding to create chiral pockets, transition metal catalysts are easy to modify. This means ligands attached to transition metal catalysts can be simply swapped out to tune the catalyst’s properties. As a result, Weck’s system could easily be adapted for other reactions with incompatible catalysts. Weck intends to extend this work to include three or four catalysts in a single one pot reaction. He likens a multi-catalyst system to a car factory. ‘One person installs the motor, the next the wheels. We want to build a small factory of catalysts to install several chiral centres in the molecule.’

Andrew Sutherland from the University of Glasgow, UK, believes that the impact of this work could be significant. ‘If the use of these micelles can be generalised and extended to include a greater number of incompatible catalytic transformations, then this could really lead to quite sophisticated one-pot multi-step syntheses of complex organic compounds,’ he says.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on October 16, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe