Monkey Police Provide Social Stability

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Of the 21 species of macaque monkeys, pigtailed macaques live in societies that fall somewhere between the despotic and egalitarian extremes. A dominant male and female run the show but conflict among other monkeys is common, though rarely extreme. Most such conflicts end with a third party intervening, usually in favor of one opponent. But sometimes the most powerful monkeys literally stand between the two combatants and, occasionally without even threatening them, impartially resolve the conflict. It is this occasional policing that allows pigtailed macaque society to be more diverse instead of breaking down into warring cliques, according to new research.

Jessica Flack and her colleagues at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center studied a group of 84 pigtailed macaques both under normal conditions and in the absence of the three high-powered males, including the leader of the troop, who did most of the policing. The researchers recorded the amount of grooming, play, sitting while touching and sitting close to one another under each of these conditions. Without the police, the remaining monkeys predominantly interacted with their most familiar fellows, forming small groups and sitting apart from each other in order to avoid conflicts.

"Our study is the first to show that these interventions not only control conflict, despite being infrequent, but also have a systemic effect on social organization by changing how individuals build their social networks," Flack says. "For example, we find that in the presence of policing, individuals have more grooming partners."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers only removed the dominant monkeys for short periods of time, because otherwise dominance struggles might have broken out, Flack explains. They also were not able to remove the dominant female--who also plays a policing role from time to time--because to do so would have entirely disrupted the monkeys' social structure. No other monkeys stepped up to fill the policing void, and, in another variation, the removal of a lower ranking monkey had no effect on the overall social network, according to the findings published today in Nature.

Large primate social networks have been shown by previous research to cut down on infant mortality, among other things, which means that conflict management such as policing is crucial not just for reducing fighting but also in promoting species survival. This kind of interaction between individuals and their social milieu provides a more accurate picture of how monkeys' physical characteristics and behavior evolve in tandem with the overall environment, Flack argues. "Phenotypes do not evolve to fit a static environment," she says. "Both the environment and the phenotype dynamically co-construct one another."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe