Most People Get Happier as They Approach Midlife

Contrary to older findings, a new study shows happiness rises through our 30s and perhaps beyond

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

High school and college are the glory days, and it's all downhill from there, right? Until now, research has supported that popular idea, suggesting that life satisfaction reaches its low point in middle age. New findings, however, suggest that we continually get happier well into our 30s and perhaps beyond.

Past studies that attempted to look at lifelong happiness used a cross-sectional method. At a given point in time, a research team would survey demographically matched groups of people who were different ages. These studies consistently found that the youngest and oldest adults were most satisfied with their life. Happiness seemed to follow a U-shaped curve: higher in the teens and early 20s, then steadily falling to a low point in middle age before increasing again.

The problem is that people in different generations might be on different trajectories. “Cross-sectional is a nice first pass, but it can't be a final word,” says Daniel Mroczek, a psychologist at Northwestern University who was not involved in the new study. To paint a more accurate picture, researchers at the University of Alberta analyzed data from a longitudinal study that followed 968 high school students until they were 43 years old and another group of 574 university students until they were 37. The groups filled out surveys about happiness at seven time points from 1985 to 2010, revealing that their levels of life satisfaction increased steadily with only a slight downturn at age 43 for the high school cohort. Even with the downturn, happiness at the final time point was significantly higher than it had been initially. The results held when the researchers controlled for factors such as socioeconomic status, marital status and physical health.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the longitudinal data are strong, there may be factors affecting the Canadian population studied—such as a stable economy and universal health care—that would not hold true for other populations. Even so, it is important to recognize that feeling unsatisfied in midlife may not be the norm. “One danger of thinking that midlife is a low point is that if someone does have a crisis (for example, depression), the person might not seek help,” says Nancy Galambos, a developmental psychologist at Alberta and lead author of the study.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe