MRI Study Shows Lying Brains Look Different

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Your brain may give you away when you're telling a lie, a new study suggests. Research presented on Tuesday at the national meeting of the Society for Neuroscience revealed differences in brain activity when people told the truth versus when they fibbed.

Daniel Langleben and colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the brains of volunteers taking what is known as the Guilty Knowledge Test. In the test, participants were each given a playing card¿the five of clubs in this case¿and were told to hide it in their pockets and deny holding it when asked. Later, in the MRI scanner, a computer flashed pictures of playing cards and asked the subjects if they had the card featured on the screen. "Sections of the brain that exercise a significant role in how humans pay attention, and monitor and control errors (the anterior cingulate gyrus and parts of the prefrontal and premotor cortex), were, on average, more active in the volunteers when they were lying than when they were telling the truth," Langleben reports.

The researchers suggest that there is a localized brain reaction that correlates to deception. In fact, according to Langleben, because fMRI provides a more direct measure of brain activity than does the polygraph, it may hold advantages over that approach to lie detection.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe