New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mysterious "Magnetar" Likely Formed with Help from Runaway Star

The detection of a runaway star may explain how a massive object turned into a dense, magnetic magnetar instead of collapsing into a black hole

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A single "runaway" star in a distant star cluster could explain how a massive supernova avoided collapsing into a black hole, leaving behind a remnant object instead.

The find explains the presence of a magnetar — a bizarre object that is not only highly dense but also extremely magnetic — in the star cluster Westerlund 1, about 16,000 light-years from Earth. Magnetars are a rare type of neutron star that is left behind after a supernova explosion. They are also known by their "starquakes" that send gamma ray radiation into the cosmos. You can watch a video about the magnetar on Space.com.

Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216 has been known for some time, but what puzzled astronomers was how it formed from an exploding star that was likely 40 times as massive as the sun. At that mass, nothing should have been left behind from the implosion besides a black hole. [10 Strangest Things in Space]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Finding a runaway star

Years ago, astronomers proposed that the magnetar was created from the gravity of two huge stars orbiting each other in a very compact arrangement, so small that their system would fit inside the Earth's orbit around the sun. That theory, however, required finding a companion star.

The new study looked for any "runaway" stars that would have been thrown out of the original orbit by the supernova explosion. One candidate — Westerlund 1-5 — behaved exactly as predicted.

"Not only does this star have the high velocity expected if it is recoiling from a supernova explosion, but the combination of its low mass, high luminosity and carbon-rich composition appear impossible to replicate in a single star — a smoking gun that shows it must have originally formed with a binary companion," said Ben Ritchie, an astronomer at Open University who co-authored the new study.

Double trouble

Using this information, the astronomers reconstructed the magnetar's history and concluded these objects likely form only in double star systems.

The story begins when the more massive star in the binary system starts to burn through the last of its fuel. Its outer layers shed and then transfer over to the companion star — the future magnetar. The companion speeds up its rotation, which is believed to be the key to the magnetar's highly magnetic field.

Eventually, the companion star grows so massive that it sheds those layers. Much of this material bleeds into space, but some gathers again on the original star — creating a unique chemical signature. It is this second "mass transfer" that stops the companion star from turning into a black hole when it implodes.

A paper study on this research will be published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, led by Open University's Simon Clark.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time.

More by Elizabeth Howell

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe