Nanodiamond Stardust Findings May Cloud Picture of Solar System Origins

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although rare on earth, diamonds are commonplace in outer space--or at least tiny ones are. Dubbed "nanodiamonds," the carbon specks are in fact the most prevalent variety of stardust . Conventional wisdom holds that the ancient material formed before the birth of our solar system. Investigators have thus used these relics to examine the origins of our sun and planets. But new work, published in the current issue of the journal Nature, warns that stardust may not be as old as has been assumed.

Meteorites from our solar system¿s asteroid belt contain large quantities of nanodiamonds. Theoretically, then, comet remnants should contain even greater amounts of these ancient particles, because comets form far away from the sun, where more presolar material--and thus nanodiamonds--should survive. To test this theory, Z. R. Dal of Georgia Institute of Technology and colleagues compared the nanodiamond composition of two meteorites with that of comet remnants. The researchers found few, if any, nanodiamonds in the comet fragments. "We presumed that if we studied (micro) meteorites (also known as interplanetary dust particles from comets) from further out in our solar system, we would find more nanodiamonds," remarks team member John Bradley of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. "But we¿re just not seeing them."

The scientists offer a few explanations for their findings. The first is that the stardust, instead of being a relic of pre-solar system days, formed within the early solar system. "Our findings are consistent with recent research that has detected nanodiamonds within the accretion discs of other young stars that are similar to our early solar system," Bradley reports. Alternatively, perhaps nanodiamonds really did develop prior to the birth of our sun, but their abundance decreases as distance from the sun increases instead of the other way around. If so, scientists¿ understanding of how material circulates in the early solar system is fundamentally flawed. Future work will help determine whether nanodiamonds are an astronomer¿s best friend, or a false hope.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe