New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

NASA Reschedules Troubled Mars InSight Mission to 2018

Instrument problems prevented the Martian lander from launching in March 2016 as planned

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NASA has rescheduled the launch of its Mars InSight spacecraft for May 2018 — delaying its send-off by 26 months.

Insight was originally set to launch in March 2016, but NASA called off the launch in December because of leaks in the spacecraft's primary scientific instrument, a seismometer. The space agency said then that it was considering whether to cancel the mission outright.

The seismometer, built by the French space agency CNES, will be repaired in time to make the 2018 launch window, said Jim Green, the head of NASA's planetary sciences division in Washington DC. “That's terrific news,” he told a planetary sciences advisory panel on March 9.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, will assume responsibility for building a new vacuum enclosure for the seismometer.

NASA did not say how much the delay might cost. Green said that the money needed to continue the mission would come from NASA's planetary sciences budget. He did not specify how it might impact other missions under development in the Discovery class, to which the $425-million InSight belongs.

NASA is currently considering five Discovery ideas — including missions to Venus and asteroids — and will choose at least one later this year to develop towards flight, likely in the early 2020s. Because the agency has not been flying Discovery missions as frequently as it would like, Green has been considering whether to pick two proposed missions from the current crop. All five are currently working through “Phase A” studies, which include detailed engineering analysis in order to develop cost estimates.

“We can only know if we can select more than one based on the Phase A studies,” Green said. “At that point we will have the information necessary.” Those numbers are expected later this year.

InSight is currently in storage at Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Denver, Colorado, which built the spacecraft. The mission is meant to study the martian interior by using the seismometer to monitor marsquakes ringing through the planet. If the spacecraft launches in May 2018 it would arrive at Mars in November of that year.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on March 9, 2016.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe