New Billion-Star Map Reveals Secrets of the Milky Way

The first results from the Gaia mission are poised to rewrite astronomy textbooks, starting with an upgrade to the size of our galaxy

The Milky Way and its neighbouring galaxies are shown in this map based on Gaia satellite data: brighter regions indicate denser concentrations of stars.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The European Space Agency (ESA) has released the largest, most detailed map of the Milky Way, pinpointing the 3D positions of 1.1 billion stars, 400 million of which were previously unknown to science.

ESA’s Gaia space observatory mapped out the catalogue. It is expected to transform what astronomers know about the Galaxy—allowing researchers to discover new extrasolar planets, examine the distribution of dark matter, and fine-tune models of how stars evolve.

Hundreds of astronomers began to access the database as soon as it was made publicly available on September 14, says Gaia project scientist Timo Prusti, who works at ESA's European Space Research and Technology Centre in Noordwijk, the Netherlands. “My advice to the astronomical community is: please enjoy with us,” he said at a press conference in Madrid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gaia has already found more stars than researchers expected, which suggests that the Milky Way may be slightly bigger than previously estimated, says Gisella Clementini, a Gaia researcher at the Bologna Astronomical Observatory in Italy.

But few new results were announced at the catalogue’s unveiling, as Gaia’s team were only allowed to do limited analyses before the data release—contrary to the norm for space observatories, where mission scientists often have up to a year’s exclusive use of their data before sharing them with the world.

One notable result, however, is a new measurement of the distance of the Pleiades, a cluster of stars in the constellation Taurus that has been the subject of a long-running controversy. Where numerous measurements put the Pleiades cluster at a distance of about 135 parsecs (440 light years) from the Sun, Gaia’s predecessor, the Hipparcos mission, found it to be about 15 parsecs closer.

Gaia measured 134 parsecs, give or take 6 parsecs—suggesting that the Hipparcos findings were inaccurate. Anthony Brown, an astronomer at the Leiden Observatory in the Netherlands who chairs Gaia’s data-processing collaboration, stresses that the results are still preliminary and that they could change once Gaia collects more data. (Ultimately, Gaia should be able to measure the distances of individual stars in the cluster for the first time, rather than an average.)

But there’s scant possibility that Gaia’s results will be corrected so much that they agree with the Hipparcos results, thinks David Soderblom, an astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland. “It’s not impossible but it sure isn’t very likely at this point,” he says. “That to me is basically the answer.” Soderblom expects that the trouble with the Hipparcos measurement may have been in corrections made to account for the unusual brightness of stars in the cluster.

Gaia launched in late 2013 and started its scientific mission in July 2014. The preliminary catalogue released today is based on its first 14 months of data-taking. Gaia does not take still exposures in the way of ordinary telescope cameras. Instead, it constantly spins on its axis every six hours, watching stars leave streaks along its 1-gigapixel detector.

By comparing scans of the sky taken six months apart, researchers are able to triangulate and measure stars' distances, using a method known as parallax that dates back to ancient Greece. For more than two million stars, the catalogue also includes accurate measurement of the stars’ distances from the Sun and their motion, obtained by comparing Gaia data with Hipparcos’s. In future releases, the catalogue will grow to include the distances and velocities of more than a billion stars.

With more years of observation, Gaia’s measurements will become so accurate that the distances of many of the galaxy’s stars will be pinpointed to within 1%.

“What Gaia is going to do is going to be phenomenal,” says Wendy Freedman, an astronomer at the University of Chicago in Illinois. “It will be the fundamental go-to place for astronomers for decades to come.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 14, 2016.

Davide Castelvecchi is a staff reporter at Nature who has been obsessed with quantum spin for essentially his entire life. Follow him on X @dcastelvecchi

More by Davide Castelvecchi

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe